5.1.2026 – the nice and exact

the nice and exact
appreciation of words
express full meaning

Knowledge of a language is measured by the nice and exact appreciation of words.

There is no more important element in the technique of rhetoric than the continual employment of the best possible word.

Whatever part of speech it is it must in each case absolutely express the full meaning of the speaker. It will leave no room for alternatives.

Words exist in virtue of no arbitrary rule but have been evolved by the taste and experience of mankind and the instinct of language is implanted very deeply in the human character.

From the essay, The Scaffolding of Rhetoric by Winston Churchill, about which his son, Randolph wrote:

In this prescient essay the 23-year-old Churchill asks: is “the force” of an orator a born quality? Not quite, he concludes: “…rhetorical power is neither wholly bestowed nor wholly acquired, but cultivated.” Yet the speaker displays his deepest feelings before his audience: “Before he can inspire them with any emotion he must be swayed by it himself. When he would rouse their indignation his heart is filled with anger. Before he can inspire them with any emotion he must be swayed by it himself.”

From The Churchill Documents, vol. 2, Young Soldier, 1896-1901 edited by Randolph S. Churchill(Hillsdale College Press, 2006, 816-21).

Charles III spoke in Congress this past week.

Everywhere he went afterward, people thanked him for his speech.

We needed to hear that people shouted to the King.

I found the speech very refreshing.

Instead of a bunch of statements, more or less spilled out as the ideas came to the speaker, here was a speech, laid out, constructed from start to finish.

A nice and exact appreciation of words.

And delivered very nicely too as I remember working with a news director who always wanted captioning used anytime Charles spoke.

Words are wonderful.

Words can be used wonderfully.

I miss them in public life.

Here is the text of HRH speech:

Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, members of Congress, representatives of the American people across all states, territories, cities, and communities.

“I would like to take this opportunity to express my particular gratitude to you all for the great honor of addressing this joint meeting of Congress and, on behalf of the queen and myself, to thank the American people for welcoming us to the United States to mark this semi-quincentennial year of the Declaration of Independence.

“And for all of that time, our destinies as nations have been interlinked. As Oscar Wilde said, ‘We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language.’

“Ladies and gentlemen, we meet in times of great uncertainty; in times of conflict from Europe to the Middle East, which pose immense challenges for the international community and whose impact is felt in communities the length and breadth of our own countries.

“We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from this great building that sought to harm the leadership of your nation and to foment wider fear and discord.

“Let me say with unshakeable resolve: such acts of violence will never succeed. Whatever our differences, whatever disagreements we may have, we stand united in our commitment to uphold democracy, to protect all our people from harm, and to salute the courage of those who daily risk their lives in the service of our countries.

“Standing here today, it is hard not to feel the weight of history on my shoulder — because the modern relationship between our two nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250 years, but over four centuries. It is extraordinary to think that I am the 19th in our line of sovereigns to study, with daily attention, the affairs of America.

“So, I come here today with the highest respect for the United States Congress, this citadel of democracy created to represent the voice of all American people to advance sacred rights and freedoms.

“Speaking in this renowned chamber of debate and deliberation, I cannot help but think of my late mother, Queen Elizabeth, who, in 1991, was also afforded this signal honor and similarly spoke under the watchful eye of the Statue of Freedom above us. Today I am here on this great occasion in the life of our nations to express the highest regard and friendship of the British people to the people of the United States.

“As you may know, when I address my own Parliament at Westminster, we still follow an age-old tradition and take a member of Parliament ‘hostage,’ holding him or her at Buckingham Palace until I am safely returned. These days, we look after our ‘guest’ rather well – to the point that they often do not want to leave. I don’t know, Mr. Speaker, if there were any volunteers for that role here today?

“As I look back across the centuries, Mr. Speaker, there emerge certain patterns, certain self-evident truths from which we can learn and draw mutual strength.

“With the spirit of 1776 in our minds, we can perhaps agree that we do not always agree – at least in the first instance. Indeed, the very principle on which your Congress was founded – no taxation without representation – was at once a fundamental disagreement between us, and at the same time a shared democratic value which you inherited from us.

“Ours is a partnership born out of dispute, but no less strong for it, so perhaps, in this example, we can discern that our nations are in fact instinctively like-minded – a product of the common democratic, legal and social traditions in which our governance is rooted to this day.

“Drawing on these values and traditions, time and again, our two countries have always found ways to come together. And by Jove, Mr. Speaker, when we have found that way to agree, what great change is brought about – not just for the benefit of our peoples, but of all peoples.

“This, I believe, is the special ingredient in our relationship. As President Trump himself observed during his state visit to Britain last autumn, ‘The bond of kinship and identity between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable.’

“This is by no means my first visit to Washington DC – the capital of this great republic. It is in fact my 20th visit to the United States, and my first as King and head of the Commonwealth.

“This is a city which symbolizes a period in our shared history, or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my five-times Great Grandfather, King George III. King George never set foot in America and, please rest assured, I am not here as part of some cunning rearguard action.

“The Founding Fathers were bold and imaginative rebels with a cause. Two hundred and fifty years ago, or, as we say in the United Kingdom ‘just the other day,’ they declared Independence. By balancing contending forces and drawing strength in diversity, they united 13 disparate colonies to forge a nation on the revolutionary idea of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ They carried with them, and carried forward, the great inheritance of the British Enlightenment – as well as the ideals which had an even deeper history in English common law and Magna Carta.

“These roots run deep, and they are still vital. Our Declaration of Rights of 1689 was not only the foundation of our constitutional monarchy, but also provided the source of so many of the principles reiterated, often verbatim, in the American Bill of Rights of 1791.

“And those roots go even further back in our history: the U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society has calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 Supreme Court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances.

“This is the reason why there stands a stone, by the River Thames at Runnymede where Magna Carta was signed in the year 1215. This stone records that an acre of that ancient and historic site was given to the United States of America by the people of the United Kingdom, to symbolize our shared resolve in support of liberty, and in memory of President John F. Kennedy.

“Distinguished members of the 119th Congress, it is here in these very halls that this spirit of liberty and the promise of America’s founders is present in every session and every vote cast.

“Not by the will of one, but by the deliberation of many, representing the living mosaic of the United States. In both of our countries, it is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse and free societies that gives us our collective strength, including to support victims of some of the ills that, so tragically, exist in both our societies today.

“And, Mr. Speaker, for many here – and for myself – the Christian faith is a firm anchor and daily inspiration that guides us not only personally, but together as members of our community. Having devoted a large part of my life to interfaith relationships and greater understanding, it is that faith in the triumph of light over darkness which I have found confirmed countless times.

“Through it I am inspired by the profound respect that develops as people of different faiths grow in their understanding of each other. It is why it is my hope – my prayer – that, in these turbulent times, working together and with our international partners, we can stem the beating of plowshares into swords.

“I am mindful that we are still in the season of Easter, the season that most strengthens my hope. It is why I believe, with all my heart, that the essence of our two nations is a generosity of spirit and a duty to foster compassion, to promote peace, to deepen mutual understanding and to value all people, of all faiths, and of none.

“The alliance that our two nations have built over the centuries, and for which we are profoundly grateful to the American people, is truly unique. And that alliance is part of what Henry Kissinger described as Kennedy’s ‘soaring vision’ of an Atlantic partnership based on twin pillars: Europe and America. That partnership, I believe Mr. Speaker, is more important today than it has ever been.

“The first reigning British sovereign to set foot in America was my grandfather, King George VI. He visited in 1939 with my beloved grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. The forces of fascism in Europe were on the march, and some time before the United States had joined us in the defense of freedom. Our shared values prevailed.

“Today, we find ourselves in a new era, but those values remain.

“It is an era that is, in many ways, more volatile and more dangerous than the world to which my late mother spoke, in this chamber, in 1991.

“The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear alone. But in this unpredictable environment, our alliance cannot rest on past achievements, or assume that foundational principles simply endure. As my Prime Minister said last month: ‘ours is an indispensable partnership. We must not disregard everything that has sustained us for the last eighty years. Instead, we must build on it.’

“Renewal today starts with security. The United Kingdom recognizes that the threats we face demand a transformation in British defense.

“That is why our country, in order to be fit for the future, has committed to the biggest sustained increase in defense spending since the Cold War – during part of which, over 50 years ago, I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy, following in the naval footsteps of my father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh; my grandfather, King George VI; my great uncle, Lord Mountbatten; and my great grandfather, King George V.

“This year, of course, also marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11. This atrocity was a defining moment for America and your pain and shock were felt around the whole world. During my visit to New York, my wife and I will again pay our respects to the victims, the families, and the bravery shown in the face of terrible loss. We stood with you then. And we stand with you now in solemn remembrance of a day that shall never be forgotten.

“In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when NATO invoked Article Five for the first time, and the United Nations Security Council was united in the face of terror, we answered the call together – as our people have done so for more than a century, shoulder to shoulder, through two World Wars, the Cold War, Afghanistan and moments that have defined our shared security.

“Today, Mr. Speaker, that same, unyielding resolve is needed for the defense of Ukraine and her most courageous people. It is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace. From the depths of the Atlantic to the disastrously melting icecaps of the Arctic, the commitment and expertise of the United States Armed Forces and its allies lie at the heart of NATO, pledged to each other’s defense, protecting our citizens and interests, keeping North Americans and Europeans safe from our common adversaries.

“Our defense, intelligence and security ties are hard-wired together through relationships measured not in years, but in decades.

“Today, thousands of U.S. service personnel, defense officials and their families are stationed in the United Kingdom, as British personnel serve with equal pride across 30 American states. We are building F-35s together. And we have agreed the most ambitious submarine program in history, AUKUS, in partnership with Australia, a country of which I am also immensely proud to serve as sovereign.

“We do not embark on these remarkable endeavors together out of sentiment. We do so because they build greater shared resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for generations to come.

“Our common ideals were not only crucial for liberty and equality, they are also the foundation of our shared prosperity. The rule of law: the certainty of stable and accessible rules, an independent judiciary resolving disputes and delivering impartial justice. These features created the conditions for centuries of unmatched economic growth in our two countries. This is why our governments are concluding new economic and technology agreements – to write the next chapter of our joint prosperity and ensure that British and American ingenuity continues to lead the world.

“Our nations are combining talent and resources in the technologies of tomorrow: our new partnerships in nuclear fusion and quantum computing, and in AI and drug discovery, holding the promise of saving countless lives.

“More broadly, we celebrate the 430 billion dollars in annual trade that continues to grow, the 1.7 trillion dollars in mutual investment that fuels that innovation, and the millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic supported across both economies. These are strong foundations on which to continue to build, for generations yet unborn.

“Our ties in education, research, and cultural exchange empower citizens and future leaders of both countries.

“The Marshall Scholarship, named after the great General George Marshall, and the Association of which I am so proud to be patron, are emblematic of the connection between our two countries.

“Since its founding, more than 2,300 scholarships have been awarded, opening doors for Americans from all walks of life to study at the United Kingdom’s leading universities.

“So as we look toward the next 250 years, we must also reflect on our shared responsibility to safeguard nature, our most precious and irreplaceable asset.

“Millennia before our nations existed, before any border drawn, the mountains of Scotland and Appalachia were one, a single, continuous range, forged in the ancient collision of continents.

“The natural wonders of the United States of America are indeed a unique asset, and generations of Americans have risen to this calling: indigenous, political and civic leaders, people in rural communities and cities alike, have all helped to protect and nurture what President Theodore Roosevelt called ‘the glorious heritage’ of this land’s extraordinary natural splendor, on which so much of its prosperity has always depended.

“Yet even as we celebrate the beauty that surrounds us, our generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical natural systems which threatens far more than the harmony and essential diversity of nature. We ignore at our peril the fact that these natural systems, in other words, nature’s own economy, provide the foundation for our prosperity and our national security.

“The story of the United Kingdom and the United States is, at its heart, a story of reconciliation, renewal and remarkable partnership.

“From the bitter divisions of 250 years ago, we forged a friendship that has grown into one of the most consequential alliances in human history.

“I pray with all my heart that our alliance will continue to defend our shared values, with our partners in Europe and the Commonwealth, and across the world, and that we ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward-looking.

“Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice-President, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, America’s words carry weight and meaning, as they have since Independence.

“The actions of this great nation matter even more.

“President Lincoln understood this so well, with his reflection in the magisterial Gettysburg Address that the world may little note what we say, but will never forget what we do.

“And so, to the United States of America, on your 250th birthday, let our two countries rededicate ourselves to each other in the selfless service of our peoples and of all the peoples of the world.

“God bless the United States and God bless the United Kingdom.”

4.25.2026 – life lives less in the

life lives less in the
present than in future, less
in both together

Age saw two quiet children
Go loving by at twilight,
He knew not whether homeward,
Or outward from the village,
Or (chimes were ringing) churchward.
He waited (they were strangers)
Till they were out of hearing
To bid them both be happy.
“Be happy, happy, happy,
And seize the day of pleasure.”
The age-long theme is Age’s.
’Twas Age imposed on poems
Their gather-roses burden
To warn against the danger
That overtaken lovers
From being overflooded
With happiness should have it
And yet not know they have it.
But bid life seize the present?
It lives less in the present
Than in the future always,
And less in both together
Than in the past. The present
Is too much for the senses,
Too crowding, too confusing—
Too present to imagine.

Carpe Diem by Robert Frost as published in The Witness Tree (Henry Holt: New York, 1943).

With happiness should have it and yet not know they have it.

Why do spend so much time wanting what we don’t have and not even understanding what we do have?

Always remember … carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero is the complete quote from the poet Horace.

Or …

Seize the present; trust tomorrow e’en as little as you may.

Way I heard it was … seize the day … for tomorrow a new day comes.

And today … Thank Goodness!

4.21.2026 – after horse is gone

after horse is gone
or when the steede is stolne
shut the stable durre

Out walking on the Island with my wife took the path that runs along the cross island parkway to the bridge over Broad Creek.

For sometime I have noticed that at one point, we walk through a gate in the fence that lines the parkway.

The other day, I looked a little closer and noticed we weren’t walking through a gateway in the fence along the parkway but through a fence that seems to have been set up so there could be a gate.

If ever, and we have never seen it closed, the gate where to be closed, it would be a matter of 4 or 5 feet to walk around the gate.

I wondered why out loud and my wife pointed out that maybe it was to block access to path if you had a vehicle of some sort.

I agreed that that would work but to someone who was going to drive a bike or ATV or something that fit on the path, the closed gate would not be much a deterrent.

From a point of law I guess, if one were asked was the gate closed, and it was, then it should be understood that access was restricted and those who continued around the gate would be understood to be in violation of whatever reason the gate was closed.

Still its a gate that doesn’t close anything or offer passage to anyway.

In 2012, much was made of the Governor of Alaska and they she fought for funding for a ‘Bridge to No Where’.

At the time I pointed out that didn’t bother people in Michigan as Michigan built a Bridge to No Where in 1957.

Still I stand in front of my open gate and I walk around to see what would happen if the gate might be closed.

What came to mind was the old saying of closing the barn door after the horse has left and if you this set up for your barn, closing the barn door before the horse has left wouldn’t make much difference which led me to search out the orgins of the phrase about the horse and the barn door and that led to a feller name John Heywood who put pen to paper back in the Henry 8th era.

And boy did Mr. Heywood put pen to paper.

He recorded a lot of things that we say and whether or not he SAID them first, he wrote them down and published them first in his book, The Proverbs of John Heywood, Being the “Proverbs” of that Author (Printed in 1546).

The way he put it was When the steede is stolne shut the stable durr.

Other thoughts in his book include:

But better late then never to repent this.

And while I at length debate and beat the bush,
There shall step in other men, and catch the birds,
And by long time lost in many vain words.

Wedding is destiny, And hanging likewise.

A hard beginnyng makth a good ending

Two heddis are better then one

And also I shall to reueng former hurtis,
Hold their noses to grinstone, and syt on theyr skurtis.

The nere to the churche, the ferther from God.

Be they wynners or loosers,
… beggers should be no choosers.

A man maie well bring a horse to the water,
but he can not make him drinke without he will.

According to Wikipedia, John Heywood (c. 1497 – c. 1580) was an English writer known for his plays, poems, and collection of proverbs. Although he is best known as a playwright, he was also active as a musician and composer, though no musical works survive. A devout Catholic, he nevertheless served as a royal servant to both the Catholic and Protestant regimes of Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I.

Boy Howdy! But anyone who served Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I and survived deserves to have also said If you can keep your head when all about you, but he didn’t.

(It seems Mr. Kipling did.)

Mr. Heywood did say I know on which side my bread is buttered, but he didn’t say why toast always falls buttered side down.

A lot of goofiness for a goofy gate in one essay.

I try to chronicle words, word usage and witty word play but what it comes down is what it says in the Bible.

What has been will be again,
    what has been done will be done again;
    there is nothing new under the sun.

Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)

4.19.2026 – made it very clear

made it very clear
not what he thought … someone else
is always to blame

Nathan Admonishing David by Rembrandt van Rijn – Metropolitan Museum of Art

Adapted from the New York Times opinion piece, I missed the part about the Divine Right of … Presidents? )April 19, 2026) by David French where Mr. French writes:

He [That man currently in office] posted an image on Truth Social that depicted the president as Jesus healing a sick man, with worshipers looking on in adoration, a flag of the United States waving in the background and mysterious figures floating in the sky.

The image was clearly blasphemous, and I was gratified to see a number of people whom I’d consider MAGA Christians strongly criticize the president. For example, a popular right-wing commentator, Cam Higby, posted: “I support Trump, and I spend 8 hours a day defending him. I will not defend blasphemy.” Riley Gaines, a college swimmer turned conservative podcaster, tweeted to her 1.6 million followers on X: “Why? Seriously, I cannot understand why he’d post this. Is he looking for a response? Does he actually think this?”

To consider the contrast between the biblical model of religious conscience and the actions of Trump’s Christian loyalists, recall one of the most famous confrontations with power in the Old Testament, between a prophet named Nathan and King David.

In the biblical story, David repents immediately and writes one of the most memorable psalms in Scripture. “Have mercy upon me, O God,” it begins, “According to Your lovingkindness; According to the multitude of Your tender mercies, Blot out my transgressions.”

Now let’s look to the words of Franklin Graham, one of the most prominent evangelicals in America — and one of Trump’s most zealous supporters.

In a public statement after Trump posted the image of himself as Jesus, Graham pretended to believe Trump’s absurd explanation of the image, writing, “I’m thankful the President has made it very clear that this was not at all what he thought the AI-generated image was representing — he thought it was a doctor helping someone, and when he learned of the concerns, he immediately removed the post.” But Graham didn’t stop there. He lashed out against Trump’s critics, “I think his enemies are always foaming at the mouth at any possible opportunity to make him look bad,” he wrote.

Someone else is always to blame.

We played the waiting game after that man posted that image and then claimed he did not in any way see himself as anything but a doctor in the way the image came across.

We waited.

Surely … SURELY … this crossed the line and there would be a reaction by Christians who had been saved by the Blood of Jesus Christ and who loved their Savior for the grace he offered that replaced their sins.

Surely …

When Franklin Graham finally said something, he said, “When I looked at the illustration, I didn’t jump to the same conclusion as some. There were no spiritual references — no halo, there were no crosses, no angels. It was a flag, soldiers, a nurse, fighter planes, eagles, the Statue of Liberty, and I think this is a lot to do about nothing.”

Folks, as Mr. Churchill might say, Here, surely, is the world record in the domain of the ridiculous and the contemptible.

Mr. Churchill was speaking out against the claims of one Benito (This whipped jackal) Mussolini and Mussolini’s claims of Italian victories over Greece in World War 2. 

Mr. Graham was speaking out on a subject that Mr. French said was “clearly blasphemous.”

My first reaction to Mr. Graham’s public statement was … is he on crack?

My second reaction to Mr. Graham’s public statement was … is he on meth?

My third reaction to Mr. Graham’s public statement was … is he on crack and meth?

My 4th reaction to Mr. Graham’s public statement was … why is he lying?

Mr. Graham and I grew up in the same age and era and for the most part, the same type of churches.

We spent hours on Sunday Mornings in Sunday School where we were taught Bible stories with what was know as flannel graph illustrations.

A board was cover in flannel and printed paper cut outs of figures with flannel pasted on the back would go up on the board where they would stick.

Printed paper cut outs of David and Goliath with one image of Goliath standing tall and another of Goliath landing flat and the cut outs would be swapped to go along with the narrative of story.

Anyone and I MEAN ANYONE with a biblical flannel graph saw the image posted by that man currently in office and immediately recognized who that figure was.

Mr. French doesn’t say Mr. Graham lied.

Instead, Mr. French says, “Graham pretended to believe …”

Think about that.

Graham pretended to believe.

Not sure what comes to your mind when you here the words, pretended to believe but I think of the Bible verse, Matthew 7:22-23 where Matthew records:

Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’  Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

Not a lot of wiggle room to be pretending.

Look, I am in NO position to criticize anyone on anyone’s personal relationship with God and Jesus Christ.

If anything, I feel sorry for Mr. Graham.

I feel sorry for anyone who has to pretend that their love of Christ was not and is not offended by that man currently in office.

I guess that is why the Apostle Paul felt it was necessary to tell us: continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling.

It is nothing to pretend about.

And in this case, there will be no one else to blame.

4.18.2026 – understanding that

understanding that
does not deny this is not
correct incorrect

In the Guardian article, Lewd messages linked to University of Michigan regent who led campaign against pro-Palestinian students (4/18/2026) by Tom Perkins, Mr. Perkins reports that:

The University of Michigan regent Jordan Acker, who helped lead the university’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian students, appears to have made obscene sexual comments about a Democratic party strategist in a group chat, messages provided to the Guardian reveal. The Slack messages, attributed to Acker, also include lewd comments about a female U-M student and a picture of her with her friends.

Mr. Perkins states the he reached out to lawyers who represented Mr. Acker about whether or not Mr. Acker admitted to making these comments on various social media and communicating platforms.

Mr. Perkins reports that:

When asked by the Guardian whether Acker denied writing the messages, his attorney responded: “Your understanding that Mr Acker does not deny this is not correct or incorrect.”

Lets all say that again.

Your understanding that Mr Acker does not deny this is not correct or incorrect.

Now in my day as a student at the University of Michigan, I doubt I could have named a regent or even defined their job other than to rubber stamp an approval to whatever the President of the University wanted to do.

We, as students, pretty much understood that Regent slots were doled out to the political party faithful and whichever party was winning that election cycle got to reward some long standing donor to serve and get free football tickets along with great parking rights.

Now a regent at the University of Michigan makes worldwide headline news.

Gosh, any recent worldwide headlines about Michigan (aside from the recent Basketball triumph) usually focused on the football team and the problems they were having in court.

Funny that it just hit me that the Michigan Basketball team makes headlines ON THE COURT while the Football team makes headlines IN COURT.

But I digress.

Lets get back to that statement.

Your understanding that Mr Acker does not deny this is not correct or incorrect.

Right there with Joe Tacopina, lawyer for that man in office talking about that man’s testimony about hush money payments to a porn star when he was if his client told the truth, replied, “Of course it’s not the truth! Was he supposed to tell the truth? He would be in violation of the agreement if he told the truth“.

And Mr. Gore’s “My lawyers tell me I did nothing wrong.” (After attending a fund raiser at a Buddhist temple.)

And Mr. Clintons, “That depends on what your definition of IS … is. (Indeed!)

Just once … Just one … can’t someone say …

O, my offence is rank, it smells to heaven;

Is there not rain enough in the sweet heavens

To wash it white as snow? Whereto serves mercy

Try what repentance can: what can it not? 

Yet what can it when one can not repent? 

O wretched state! O bosom black as death! 

(Hamlet, Act III, Scene IIII William Shakespeare)

Oh gee whiz.