4.15.2026 – no more for him life’s

no more for him life’s
stormy conflicts charging like
clouds across the sky

HUSH’D be the camps to-day;
And, soldiers, let us drape our war-worn weapons;
And each, with musing soul retire, to celebrate,
Our dear commander’s death.

No more for him life’s stormy conflicts;
Nor victory, nor defeat—No more time’s dark events,
Charging like ceaseless clouds across the sky.

But sing, poet, in our name;
Sing of the love we bore him—because you, dweller in
camps, know it truly.

Sing, to the lower’d coffin there;
Sing, with the shovel’d clods that fill the grave—a
verse,
For the heavy hearts of soldiers.

Hush’d Be the Camps To-Day by Walt Whitman as published in The Patriotic Poems of Walt Whitman (Garden City: Doubleday, 1918),

Wikipedia says: “Hush’d Be the Camps To-Day” is a poem by Walt Whitman dedicated to Abraham Lincoln. The poem was written on April 19, 1865, shortly after Lincoln’s assassination.

Whitman greatly admired Lincoln and went on to write additional poetry about him: “O Captain! My Captain!”, “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d”, and “This Dust Was Once the Man.”

“Hush’d” is not particularly well known, and is generally considered to have been hastily written.

Some critics highlight the poem as Whitman’s first attempt to respond to Lincoln’s death and emphasize that it would have drawn comparatively little attention if Whitman had not written his other poems on Lincoln.

Although they never met, Whitman saw Abraham Lincoln several times between 1861 and 1865, sometimes in close quarters.

The first time was when Lincoln stopped in New York City in 1861 on his way to Washington. Whitman noticed the President-elect’s “striking appearance” and “unpretentious dignity”, and trusted Lincoln’s “supernatural tact” and “idiomatic Western genius”.

He admired the President, writing in October 1863, “I love the President personally.”

Whitman considered himself and Lincoln to be “afloat in the same stream” and “rooted in the same ground”.

Whitman and Lincoln shared similar views on slavery and the Union, and similarities have been noted in their literary styles and inspirations.

Whitman later declared that “Lincoln gets almost nearer me than anybody else.”

As for the New York Times article, I am always re-amazed at the amount of correct detail the reporting had when you consider this was 1865 and the paper went to press within 24 hours of the assassaitnation.

Maybe more than his Birthday being a holiday, April 15th should be a national Day of Mourning when you look at how much this Country gained when he was born and how much this Country lost when he was killed.

Then of course, my relationship to the history has changed so much in the last decade as I review all the actions and the struggles of the past, I find it difficult to reconcile that all that history led to where we are today.

What a mockery on so many levels.

What Mr. Lincoln said on the field at Gettysburg has just as much application TODAY as it did in 1863.

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us —

that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion —

that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain —

that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom —

and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

4.9.2026 – officer and man

officer and man
allowed return to their homes
not to be disturbed

APPOMATTOX C. H., VA.,

Ap 9th, 1865.

GEN. R. E. LEE,
Comd’g C. S. A.

GEN: In accordance with the substance of my letter to you of the 8th inst., I propose to receive the surrender of the Army of N. Va. on the following terms, to wit: Rolls of all the officers and men to be made in duplicate.

One copy to be given to an officer designated by me, the other to be retained by such officer or officers as you may designate.

The officers to give their individual paroles not to take up arms against the Government of the United States until properly exchanged, and each company or regimental commander sign a like parole for the men of their commands.

The arms, artillery and public property to be parked and stacked, and turned over to the officer appointed by me to receive them.

This will not embrace the side-arms of the officers, nor their private horses or baggage.

This done, each officer and man will be allowed to return to their homes, not to be disturbed by United States authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside.

Very respectfully,

U. S. GRANT,
Lt. Gen.

So goes the letter from General US Grant (USA) to General RE LEE (CSA) offering terms of surrender for the Army of Northern Virginia on April 9, 1865, 161 years ago today.

About that moment, Bruce Catton wrote:

It was Palm Sunday, and Lee rode to the house of a man named McLean to have a talk with Grant. He wore his best uniform and he had a sword buckled at his side, and there should have been lancers and pennons and trumpets going on before, for he was the last American knight and he had a grandeur about him, and when he rode out of the war something that will never come back rode out of American life with him.

Grant looked at the beaten army and he saw his own fellow Americans, who had made their fight and lost and now wanted to go back and rebuild. But the war had aroused much hatred and bitterness, especially among those who had done no fighting, and Grant knew very well that powerful men in Washington were talking angrily of treason and of traitors, and wanting to draw up proscription lists, so that leading Confederates could be jailed or hanged.

The sentence Grant had written would make that impossible. They could proceed against Robert E. Lee, for instance, only by violating the pledged word of U. S. Grant, who had both the will and the power to see his word kept inviolate. If they could not hang Lee they could hardly hang anybody. There would be no hangings. Grant had ruled them out.

— It did not strike the eye quite as quickly, but U. S. Grant had a certain grandeur about him, too.

Remember when all of us could live in this Country not to be disturbed by United States authority.

Who knew what it would take to make America great.

3.4.2026 – trivial effort

trivial effort
man can lie, does he believe
oh, probably not

If we would learn what the human race really is, at bottom, we need only observe it in election times.

A Hartford clergyman met me in the street, and spoke of a new nominee – denounced the nomination, in strong, earnest words – words that were refreshing for their independence, their manliness.

He said, “I ought to be proud, perhaps, for this nominee is a relative of mine; on the contrary I am humiliated and disgusted; for I know him intimately – familiarly – and I know that he is an unscrupulous scoundrel, and always has been.”

You should have seen this clergyman preside at a political meeting forty days later; and urge, and plead, and gush – and you should have heard him paint the character of this same nominee.

You would have supposed he was describing the Cid, and Great-heart, and Sir Galahad, and Bayard the Spotless all rolled into one.

Was he sincere?

Yes – by that time; and therein lies the pathos of it all, the hopelessness of it all.

It shows at what trivial cost of effort a man can teach himself a lie, and learn to believe it, when he perceives, by the general drift, that that is the popular thing to do.

Does he believe his lie yet?

Oh, probably not;

From The Character of Man in The Autobiography of Mark Twain by Mark Twain (Berkeley : University of California Press, 2010).

2.22.2026 – in any instance

in any instance
violated the injunctions
incur punishment

Not sure what you think about on February 22nd but I often think of the old black and white John Wayne movie, Fort Apache.

After a long journey of crummy trains, stage coaches and other hardships, the new Commanding officer (Henry Fonda) and his daughter (Shirley Temple … yes that Shirley Temple) arrive at Fort Apache to find that not only were the officers at the fort not one bit concerned about the trials their new Commanding officer might be experiencing but his officers were having a party!

When he walks in the music and dancing comes to a halt and Fonda, cold, correct and angry, is introduced and everyone stands around staring at the floor until Fonda says, “… I take it this dance is not in my honor.’

There is quiet and John Wayne speaks up, ‘It’s a birthday dance, sir.’

Birthday. Whose birthday?

General George Washington’s, sir.

And Fonda shrinks down into the floor.

On Monday, March 4, 1793, George Washington was sworn in for the 2nd time as President of the United States.

He gave the shortest inaugural address on record.

With 135 words, General Washington said:

I am again called upon by the voice of my country to execute the functions of its Chief Magistrate. When the occasion proper for it shall arrive, I shall endeavor to express the high sense I entertain of this distinguished honor, and of the confidence which has been reposed in me by the people of united America.

Previous to the execution of any official act of the President the Constitution requires an oath of office. This oath I am now about to take, and in your presence: That if it shall be found during my administration of the Government I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.

After serving as a Virginia Delegate to the Continental Congress, then serving as Commander in Chief of the Army, then Chairman of the Constitution Convention and finally, the General said that, after all that if there was any … ANY … instance found where he violated his oath of office (preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States) he deserved both Constitutional punishment and upbraidings or intense, formal, or severe criticism (according to the online dictionary).

Just something worth thinking about today.

Happy Birthday General.

George Washington arrives for his 2nd Inaugeral

11.18.2025 – democracy most

democracy most
fragile thing on earth, it rests
upon you and me

Democracy is the most fragile thing on earth, for what does it rest upon?

You and me, and the fact that we agree to maintain it.

The moment either of us says we will not, that’s the end of it.

It doesn’t rest on anything but us; it doesn’t rest on armed force, the moment it does it isn’t democracy.

It isn’t something to kick around or experiment with.

From the preface page to the 2017 Edition of the book, Advise and Consent by Allan Drury (WordFire Press: Colorado Springs, Colorado , 2017).

Advise and Consent is one of those books AND film adaptations that I can read or watch again and again.

Watching the movie today I have to laugh the Minority Whip of the Senate arrives a the Capitol Building in a cab, walks to a news stand and buys and paper and only then learns what the President did overnight.

In today’s instant news coverage, I marvel that anything got done back in 1959.

I mean the poor guy woke up, got dressed, had breakfast and got to work before he had any news on which to plan his day.

According to Wikipedia, “Advise and Consent is a 1959 political fiction novel by Allen Drury that explores the United States Senate confirmation of controversial Secretary of State nominee Robert Leffingwell, whose promotion is endangered due to growing evidence that the nominee had been a member of the Communist Party. The chief characters’ responses to the evidence, and their efforts to spread or suppress it, form the basis of the novel.”

A Mr. Tom Kemme, in his book, Political fiction, the spirit of the age, and Allen Drury (Bowling Green State University Popular Press: Bowling Green, Ohio. 1987), writes that, “The basic assumption underlying Drury fiction is that totalitarian Communism is intrinsically evil and that Communism’s ultimate goal is world domination, an end or goal that Communists will strive to achieve by whatever moral, immoral, or amoral means are expedient, including propaganda, lies, subversion, intimidation, infiltration, betrayal, and violence.”

Had anyone been able to tell Mr. Drury that such a threat would be coming, not from Communists buy from within the Government, he would have dismissed the plot as impossible to believe.

But if we make one slight change, that phrase can be read …

The current administration is intrinsically evil and that the current administration‘s ultimate goal is world domination, an end or goal that the current administration will strive to achieve by whatever moral, immoral, or amoral means are expedient, including propaganda, lies, subversion, intimidation, infiltration, betrayal, and violence.

Just that last bit is worth repeating.

The current administration will strive to achieve [its goals] by whatever moral, immoral, or amoral means are expedient, including propaganda,

lies,

subversion,

intimidation,

infiltration,

betrayal,

and violence.

It’s worth repeating Mr. Drury’s warning.

Democracy is the most fragile thing on earth, for what does it rest upon? You and me, and the fact that we agree to maintain it. The moment either of us says we will not, that’s the end of it. It doesn’t rest on anything but us; it doesn’t rest on armed force, the moment it does it isn’t democracy. It isn’t something to kick around or experiment with.

It isn’t something to kick around or experiment with.