4.9.2026 – officer and man

officer and man
allowed return to their homes
not to be disturbed

APPOMATTOX C. H., VA.,

Ap 9th, 1865.

GEN. R. E. LEE,
Comd’g C. S. A.

GEN: In accordance with the substance of my letter to you of the 8th inst., I propose to receive the surrender of the Army of N. Va. on the following terms, to wit: Rolls of all the officers and men to be made in duplicate.

One copy to be given to an officer designated by me, the other to be retained by such officer or officers as you may designate.

The officers to give their individual paroles not to take up arms against the Government of the United States until properly exchanged, and each company or regimental commander sign a like parole for the men of their commands.

The arms, artillery and public property to be parked and stacked, and turned over to the officer appointed by me to receive them.

This will not embrace the side-arms of the officers, nor their private horses or baggage.

This done, each officer and man will be allowed to return to their homes, not to be disturbed by United States authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside.

Very respectfully,

U. S. GRANT,
Lt. Gen.

So goes the letter from General US Grant (USA) to General RE LEE (CSA) offering terms of surrender for the Army of Northern Virginia on April 9, 1865, 161 years ago today.

About that moment, Bruce Catton wrote:

It was Palm Sunday, and Lee rode to the house of a man named McLean to have a talk with Grant. He wore his best uniform and he had a sword buckled at his side, and there should have been lancers and pennons and trumpets going on before, for he was the last American knight and he had a grandeur about him, and when he rode out of the war something that will never come back rode out of American life with him.

Grant looked at the beaten army and he saw his own fellow Americans, who had made their fight and lost and now wanted to go back and rebuild. But the war had aroused much hatred and bitterness, especially among those who had done no fighting, and Grant knew very well that powerful men in Washington were talking angrily of treason and of traitors, and wanting to draw up proscription lists, so that leading Confederates could be jailed or hanged.

The sentence Grant had written would make that impossible. They could proceed against Robert E. Lee, for instance, only by violating the pledged word of U. S. Grant, who had both the will and the power to see his word kept inviolate. If they could not hang Lee they could hardly hang anybody. There would be no hangings. Grant had ruled them out.

— It did not strike the eye quite as quickly, but U. S. Grant had a certain grandeur about him, too.

Remember when all of us could live in this Country not to be disturbed by United States authority.

Who knew what it would take to make America great.

4.8.2026 – in war tactics and

in war tactics and
operations for naught if
strategy is flawed

Of course, in war tactics and operations are for naught if the strategy is flawed.

British General Sir Garnet Wolseley encouraged colonial commanders to seize what the enemy prized most.

Gallwell counselled offensive action and dramatic battles because he believed it the best way to demonstrate the ‘moral superiority’ of the European.

This worked best against a foe with a fairly cohesive system – a capital, a king, a standing army, a religious bond — some symbol of authority or legitimacy which, once overthrown, discouraged further resistance.

But that was easier said than done.

Indigenous societies might be too primitive to have a centralized political or military system, or to assign value to the seizure of a city like Algiers or Kabul.

Insurrections against both English and Spanish rule in the New World began in the cities.

Efowever, the ability to control major cities did not win the war for either power, and in fact weakened them by forcing them to scatter their forces.

Shamil would pull his population deep into the mountains and force the Russians to attack fortified villages organized in depth, while he simultaneously slashed at their greatly extended supply lines, a tactic which Mao successfully replicated against Ghiang’s ‘encirclement’ campaigns of the early 1930s.

And while the Russians might eventually take these villages after desperate fighting, their casualties were such that victory was gutted of strategic significance and they were inevitably forced to retreat through hostile country.

From Wars of empire by Douglas Porch, (London: Cassell, 2000), as part of Cassell’s History of Warfare Series, John Keegan, General Editor.

MR. LINCOLN FINDS A BROOM TO HIS LIKING.
In this cartoon from Leslie’s on March 7, 1864, the broom labeled “Grant” replaces the worn-out brooms of McClellan, Hooker and Pope after Grant’s victories had made it clear he should be the Union leader.

4.7.2026 – simple, be expert

simple, be expert
treat people well, honest, push …
without browbeating

I have no idea who this lady is.

We were on the beach on Hilton Head Island with the grand kids on Monday when this lady walked by with her family.

She saw my sweatshirt (and my swim trunks … and after I pointed it out, my M earring) and said that we needed a picture so I was happy to oblige.

She wished me luck in the game that would played that Monday night for the Championship of the Free World between UConn and Michigan.

I said thank you and smiled.

Her husband asked, “Don’t you want to wish us luck?”

“Nope!” I said.

Sorry, but not sorry, and not taking any chances that any of my wishes for good luck might land on the court at the end of the game fall on them huskies.

Nope no way.

And so Michigan won.

“How did they win?” you might ask.

According to Joe Rexrode of the New York Times but originally from the Lansing State Journal when we both worked from Gannett (Once a sparty always a sparty) described what Dusty May did at Michigan writing:

The bigger picture is simpler. Be an expert in your craft. Treat people well. Be honest with them. Push them without browbeating them. Create an effective working environment.

May’s staff takes pride in both the evaluation and development of players, and it can get granular — they like to take potential recruits to a gym with a rack of basketballs. The guys who can’t help but go grab a ball and start shooting are probably the ones who love the game to the extent required. *

Goodness, that is worth repeating isn’t it?

The bigger picture is simpler.

Be an expert in your craft.

Treat people well.

Be honest with them.

Push them without browbeating them.

Create an effective working environment.

Simple.

Ken Burns made a film on the life of Frank Lloyd Wright.

In it, Architect Philip Johnson says about Wright, in an interview:

Try to define the genius of a man who you realize is a genius when you are talking to him and more of a genius when you get to know his work …

its probably one of this things that doesn’t go into words …

probably a matter of how moved are you by his work and his personality …

in this case both …

I hated him of course, but that’s only normal when a man is so great …

its combination of hatred, a combination of envy and contempt and misunderstanding …

all of it gets mixed up in his genius.”

Johnson then talks about what Wright did with his famous house, Falling Water, “I don’t know how he does that. If I did, … I would do it too!”

What Dusty did with Michigan?

Simple.

That’s why so many other coaches did the same thing.

*Michigan’s Dusty May knows what they’ve been saying, but he’s getting the last word By Joe Rexrode

4.6.2026 – definitely know

definitely know
don’t have all the answers, but
am always looking

Reading through the papers this morning and all about how Michigan will win the big game tonight and how Michigan won’t win the big game tonight.

I came across one of my favorite columnists, Nancy Armour, and I was thinking, isn’t she connected with Michigan somehow so I clicked on her name to see if it linked to a bio.

It didn’t and she isn’t (she went to Northwestern) but the link had a little line of Who-I-Am and Ms. Armour wrote:

[I am A] Columnist for USA TODAY Sports, writing about a little bit of everything. I definitely know I don’t have all the answers, but I’m always looking for more of them.

I like that.

I like that a lot.

I couldn’t easily use that line for this blog.

I am a self proclaimed poet, writing about a little bit of everything.

I definitely know I don’t have all the answers, but I’m always looking for more of them.

4.5.2-26 – why do you look for

why do you look for
the living among the dead?
remember, told you

Why do you look for the living among the dead? He is not here; he has risen! Remember how he told you, while he was still with you in Galilee: ‘The Son of Man must be delivered over to the hands of sinners, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.’ ” Then they remembered his words.

Luke 24 (New International Version)

Workshop of Peter Paul Rubens – The Women at Christ’s empty tomb (1640)