part is that folks don’t
expect the U.S. Senate
to be functional
For the article, Who Should Represent Michigan?, the New York Times assembled a panel of experts with a range of viewpoints for a new installment of The Choice, aimed at guiding Michigan voters through the core issues in this election.
The article had a lot to say about my home state and the people who live in my home state and how the people who live in my home state vote in elections in my home state.
But there was one sentence that spoke to the country as a whole in my opinion.
A sentence that spoke to the problems we are having to deal with as an evolving democratic society.
Those founding father, to use the phrase coined by Warren Harding, put together a country that worked fairly well for the last 250 years.
It has survived wars, depressions, pandemics and who knows what else.
It has survived because 250 years those feller designed safe guards to keep things going in spite of ourselves.
The strongest links in that chain of safeguards was that the government was made up of three equal parts that checked and balanced each other out.
It wasn’t by accident.
Each part had a significant and special role to play.
In this article, Who Should Represent Michigan?, the Times panel were asked several questions and each panel member was allowed to answer.
This style of opinion piece would surly produce lots of statements that stood out.
But it was the response to the question on the Economy, How effective do you think the candidates would be at championing legislation to bring good-paying jobs to Michigan?, of panel member Sarah Anthony, a State senator from Lansing that got me.
Because to the question How effective do you think the candidates would be at championing legislation to bring good-paying jobs to Michigan?, State Senator Anthony said: So from a federal perspective, I think part of this is that folks don’t expect the U.S. Senate to be functional anyway. I think we’re looking for someone who will just speak to us and say, “Hey, man” — to whomever, the 22-year-old that’s in their mom’s basement that’s just trying to figure out life or the struggling single mom or the senior citizen who’s thinking that their grandkid won’t get it out of their kid’s basement. Those people are looking for someone who’s just going to be our loudest champion, not this thoughtful, creative policymaker.
Lots of wisdom in that statement but look at the foundation of the statement.
So from a federal perspective, I think part of this is that folks don’t expect the U.S. Senate to be functional anyway.
I think part of this is that folks don’t expect the U.S. Senate to be functional anyway.
Folks don’t expect the U.S. Senate to be functional anyway.
The next time you ask how does that current man in office get away with all this nonsense, just say to yourself, Folks don’t expect the U.S. Senate to be functional anyway.
We got to get that back,
We got to get them people in office to realize we ARE watching and they are doing nothing.
That not expecting the U.S. Senate to be functional will not be accepted.
The Senate has learned the less they do, the less that will be expected and I guess, the more they can get away with.
And that may some of the most lasting damage done to this country.




