10.3.2026 – our great inventions

our great inventions
corkscrew and toilet paper
real value to man

From the book, The etiquette of freedom : Gary Snyder, Jim Harrison, and The practice of the wild by Gary Snyder and Jim Harrison (Counterpoint: Berkeley, CA, 2010).

A documentary was made of the two poets, Gary Snyder and Jim Harrison, standing in a field, talking titled The Practice of the Wild and this book, The etiquette of freedom, is the transcript of their conversation plus some extra thoughts and commentary about the thoughts expressed by these poets.

As can be imagined, their conversation was all over the place and full of deep thoughts as poets standing in fields are filled with deep thoughts of the type that deep thinking poets think when standing in a field talking with another deep thinking poet.

Lots of nuggets to dig up here but one that caught my eye this morning was this short exchange.

Gary Snyder : Captain Cook, sailing around the Pacific in order to be the very first person out of Western culture to contact a lot of different island people, said the one thing that they really got interested in was nails. It was a really good trade item.

And Ishi says that the best thing the white man invented was glue, because it makes it so much easier to finish an arrow.

Jim Harrison: Maybe our great inventions are the corkscrew and toilet paper, more so than space stations — of real value to man.

On a rainy Saturday Morning in the Low Country of South Carolina, elevation 5 feet above sea level, I find the statement hard to argue with.

Nails?

Toilet Paper?

Corkscrew?

Things of real value to man.

Maybe our great inventions!

Because its fall and thinking of football, I remember once back when I was a student in Ann Arbor.

I was with friends on what TV would call a gorgeous, sunny, fall afternoon in the State of Michigan, gathered together with 100,000 other people to watch a football game.

Down here in the south, fans still talk about ladies and their ‘game day dress’ but that’s a southern thing and may have to do with what Mark Twain was thinking about when he said sunny fall days are just June days, tuned down.

Fall in Michigan means gray rainy cold days.

Days not fit for a dress but for cold weather clothes

But back then when I was in school, it wasn’t unusual to see fans who still dressed up to go to a game in Ann Arbor..

And understand this was in the day before ‘luxury boxes’ so no matter what, if you wanted to go to a football game in Ann Arbor, you couldn’t sit anywhere else but among the plebians in the stands.

Several rows in front of me and my friends was a party of shall we say, affluent folks.

As an aside, living in a resort town, I have made the acquaintance of some law enforcement officers and am learning some of the code they use to describe the people they have to deal with in this vacation paradise. One code is EMF. It stands for Entitled M … F… (you can fill in the blanks), but I digress.

I won’t say that these folks were EMF’s as they went along with the crowd and made no special demands or anything but they were all dressed, tastefully, more for church than a football game.

They also had brought along a wicker hamper of goodies for later in the game and we did wonder how that got past the security guards so maybe they were EMFs.

As it comes to me, it seems like they had a ticket for the hamper and it sat on the bench in the middle of this group.

The afternoon wore on and as halftime approached it was time to open the hamper.

Not saying the game was boring or anything but the focus of most of us in that section of the stadium was, what did people like this, who came dressed in church clothes to a Michigan football game and bought a ticket for their wicker hamper, would pack for lunch in that wicker hamper.

One feller seemed to be the host of this outing and he took charge of the hamper.

Out came plates and napkins and boxed sandwiches and other finger foods.

The plates were passed out.

The food was offered up.

Then wine glasses came out of the hamper and passed up and down the row.

And lastly, a bottle of wine, which the host of this outing held up for all to see.

This feller then reached back in the hamper and fumbled around.

He turned and hunched over to look down into the hamper and dug and dug and fumbled, a level of frustration building up.

He sat back up and looked at the bottle of wine.

He took a breath and stood up.

He was wearing a blue blazer and light blue shirt and a striped maize and blue tie and pressed khakis.

He stretched out his arms wide in supplication and yelled to the crowd around him, “Does anybody have a corkscrew?”

Maybe our great inventions are the corkscrew and toilet paper, more so than space stations — of real value to man.

OLD Michigan Stadium – If you wanted to go to a game, you sat with all the rest of us. No Luxury Boxes – No Private Potties – No Mr. Brightside

10.2.2026 – it is October

it is October
shall remember loans of the
sun to you in June

Silver leaves of the last of summer.
Poplar and elm silver leaves.

Leaves not least of all of the Lombardy poplar,
Standing before the autumn moon and the autumn wind
as a woman waits in a doorway for some one who
must be coming.

All you silver leaf people, you I have seen and heard
in a hundred summer winds,

It IS October, it is a week, two weeks, till the rain and frost
break on us and the leaves are washed off, washed
down

In January when the trees fork gray against a clear winter
blue in the spare sun silver of winter or the lengthened
frost silver of the long nights—

I shall remember then the loans of the sun to you in June,
I shall remember the hundred winds who kissed you

Poplar and Elm by Carl Sandburg as published in Good Morning America in The Complete Poems of Carl Sandburg (Harcourt, Brace: New York, 1970).

Not Poplar or Elm … but a grove of Live Oaks … so live they look alive with the wind in their branches

10.1.2026- the trees’ destruction

the trees’ destruction
satisfied something in soul
of man who felled it

On a hillock back of the girls’ dormitorv there was a nice stand of second-growth hardwoods, mostly maples and beeches — the same in which I played the part of Daniel Boone with my trusty broomstick rifle. In the middle of this little woodlot there was one towering tree that had somehow escaped the ax and saw when the village was built. I do not recall what sort of tree it was except that it was a hardwood, and it was a noble tree, rising far above all the other trees, a landmark visible from any¬ where in town. Now there lived in Benzonia a man who served in some official capacity; member of the county road commission or the county surveyor’s crew, or something similar. This man looked upon this tree every day, and apparently it offended him. It had survived, the only tree in the whole township that dated back to the original forest, and he seems to have felt that he ought to do something about it. He consulted the blueprints on which the village had been platted and discovered that this tree grew right in the center of what had been marked out as a highway. The highway had never been built, and never would be built, because it would be a dead-end street at each end, it led neither to nor past anything of consequence, and to build it would have required the builders to cross two deep ravines. It was wholly impractical, and everybody knew it, and to this day it remains unconstructed. But the plat said there was a roadway there, and the big tree was a trespasser. So this petty official got a few men with saws and axes, went up to the hillock, and cut the tree down.

It came down with a soul-satisfying crash and it lay, butt-end upward, on a steep hillside, leaving a flat stump as broad as a dining room table. It stayed where it fell, slowly rotting. Nobody cut it into logs or did anything else with it; nobody had ever intended to do anything with it, it was just a big tree that deserved to be laid low. A number of people shook their heads and made noises of disapproval, and my father, thinking that the tree was on ground owned by the academy, lodged a protest. But there was the plat, the tree grew in the middle of what had been laid out as a public highway, and nothing could be done. Presumably its destruction satisfied something in the soul (if that is the word for it) of the man who felled it. Anyway, what was one tree more or less in Michigan? It was gone, and my small sister found that the big flat stump made a fine place for her to play house with her dolls.

From Waiting for the Morning Train: A Michigan Boyhood by Bruce Catton (Doubleday: Garden City, N.Y., 1972).

But the plat said there was a roadway there, and the big tree was a trespasser. So this petty official got a few men with saws and axes, went up to the hillock, and cut the tree down.

Presumably its destruction satisfied something in the soul (if that is the word for it) of the man who felled it.

This passage of Mr. Catton’s came to mind when I read the article, ‘Zombified’ C.D.C., Hobbled by Cuts, Struggles to Fulfill Scientific Mission by Apoorva Mandavilli science and global health reporter at The New York Times.

Ms. Mandavilli writes:

For decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was the undisputed global leader in public health. Its scientists helped train health officials worldwide. In the United States, it was the primary source of guidance for prevention and treatment of diseases, including diabetes, H.I.V. and the seasonal flu.

But after a year and a half in the cross hairs of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s drive to remake public health policy, the agency is a skeleton of the powerhouse it was.

The changes have hindered the C.D.C.’s ability to respond to outbreaks as measles spreads at home and Ebola abroad, and to issue timely guidance on vaccinations as cooling temperatures kick off the respiratory season, according to current and former employees. State and local health departments, which rely on the C.D.C. for resources and technical advice, have been stymied by delays. Entire divisions have been shuttered, including teams that worked on smoking, sexual violence, child abuse and falls among older adults.

From the very first day of Mr. Trump’s second term, when he withdrew the country from the W.H.O., his administration has sought to upend the nation’s health policies and align them with his political priorities.

Last year, an H.H.S. official directed the C.D.C. to award a no-bid contract — a rarity for the agency — to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to explore whether immunizing pregnant women would lead to autism in their children, a theory that Mr. Kennedy has espoused but that has been debunked by numerous studies. To pay for the research, the C.D.C. took $362,000 from a program that provides free vaccines to about half of American children.

The agency’s dysfunction is alarming public health experts even outside the country, who had long relied on the C.D.C.’s expertise during global crises. At a recent meeting of global flu experts, Dr. Jernigan said, “people truly believe that we are less prepared now and less capable of having a coordinated response than we were before the pandemic.”

I asked myself, what was it about the CDC being the undisputed global leader in public health that offended the man running the United States Deptartment of Health and Human Services?

Where was this plat that said there was a roadway there in place of the CDC, and the CDC was a trespasser. So that this petty official could get a few men with saws and axes and cut the CDC down?

And now that the CDC has been ‘zombified’, does it its zombification satisfy something in the soul (if that is the word for it) of the man who felled it?

I mean, who wouldn’t want to upend a nation’s health policies and align them with political priorities.

Anyway, what is one life more or less in America?

Bruce Catton

9.30.2026 – money cannot buy

money cannot buy
happiness – having enough
is still essential

Adapted from the article, These are the happiest states in America. See where your state ranks by Anthony Thompson in USAToday where Mr. Thompson writes (quoting WalletHub’s annual Happiest States in America report):

“It’s also important to note that while the adage that money can’t buy happiness has a lot of truth to it, having enough money to live comfortably is still essential. But anything beyond that won’t necessarily enhance happiness as much as having fulfilling hobbies, relationships and opportunities for personal growth.”

That line, It’s also important to note that while the adage that money can’t buy happiness has a lot of truth to it, having enough money to live comfortably is still essential got me to wondering about something so I opened up Gemini, Google’s AI Bot and asked:

In America today, how much money is needed so that you have enough money to live comfortably?

I got a very well reasoned report, nicely documented (click here for the complete Gemini Response) that in short said:

Living “comfortably” in the United States depends heavily on household size, geographic location, and lifestyle expectations. Financial studies utilizing the standard 50/30/20 budget framework (allocating 50% of income to necessities like housing and groceries, 30% to discretionary spending, and 20% to savings and debt repayment) establish key baseline income thresholds for comfortable living across the nation.

Gemini then broke out some numbers.

Income Needed by Household Size – Household Type

Average National Threshold
Single Adult: $85,000 – $100,000
Family of Four (2 adults, 2 kids): $210,000 – $240,000

Low-Cost States (e.g., WV, MS)
Single Adult: ~$81,000 – $86,000
Family of Four (2 adults, 2 kids): ~$187,000 – $195,000

High-Cost States (e.g., HI, MA, CA)
Single Adult: $124,000 – $129,000
Family of Four (2 adults, 2 kids): $300,000 – $330,000

I then asked, “How many American’s meet this level of Income right now?

The summary response I got was:

Summary Takeaway
For Single Adults: Only about 1 in 7 single Americans earns enough to meet the formal 50/30/20 definition of a “comfortable” lifestyle on a single income.

For Families of Four: About 1 in 5 families earns the combined $210,000+ necessary to cover necessities, non-essentials, and consistent 20% savings without financial strain.

That got me to thinking so I asked one more question.

I asked “How many American’s met this level of income in 2015?”

I got this response …

Single Adults (2015): Roughly 1 out of 6 to 1 out of 7 single-person households earned above the ~$60,000–$71,000 mark in 2015 dollars (~14% to 16%).

Families of Four (2015): Roughly 1 out of 4 to 1 out of 5 married families with two kids earned above the ~$150,000 mark in 2015 dollars (~19% to 23%).

Not much different but what got me was this statement:

Adjusting for inflation using the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI), cumulative inflation between 2015 and today is approximately 41%.

This means that $1.00 in 2015 had roughly the same purchasing power as $1.41 today. Deflating the current thresholds back to 2015 values yields the equivalent income needed to live “comfortably” in 2015.

So many many many numbers.

I am reminded of that old saying:

A recession is when someone is out of money.

A depression is when I am out of money.

Thinking of that line of having enough money to enhance happiness as much as having fulfilling hobbies, relationships and opportunities for personal growth as thinking about enough money to put food on the table and that remined of that line out of the depression when FDR put a man named Harry Hopkins in charge of relief efforts and according to legend, Hopkins found an office on Inauguration day and began funding programs to start emergency food distribution.

Someone in Washington told Hopkins that giving government money away like that wouldn’t work in the long run.

“People don’t eat in the long run,” said Hopkins, “they eat every day.”

Photos from the Resettlement and Farm Security Administrations and the Office of War Information 1935-1943 by the great Walker Evans.

9.29.2026 – through a glass darkly

through a glass darkly
unreliability
of eyewitnesses

There is this thing called the Rashomon Effect.

According to the Wikipedia: The Rashomon effect is the phenomenon of the unreliability of eyewitnesses. The effect is named after Akira Kurosawa’s 1950 Japanese film Rashomon, which itself is based on Ryunosuke Akutagawa’s short story “In a Grove”, in which a murder is described in four contradictory ways by four witnesses. It has been used as a storytelling and writing method in cinema in which an event is given contradictory interpretations or descriptions by the individuals involved, thereby providing different perspectives and points of view of the same incident.

An event is given contradictory interpretations or descriptions by the individuals involved, thereby providing different perspectives and points of view of the same incident.

This is a photo a friend of mine posted on Facebook of the end of last weekend’s Michigan-Iowa football game.

That the photo is of the game is incidental, as is the outcome of game (an outcome I am used to – they wouldn’t be the Amazin’ Blues if they didn’t break your heart) but look at the people looking not at the game, but at their devices.

They will have there own personal proof of being there at something they didn’t watch because they were watching their phones.

They are eyewitnesses to history, yet their proof if being an eyewitness proves they took their eye off history.

I was at several moments worth remembering in Michigan Stadium.

Anthony Carter into the endzone with no time on the clock to beat Indiana.

Desmond Howard flying 20 yards into the end zone to win the Heisman Trophy.

All remembered WITH ADVANTAGES as Mr. Shakespeare would say and without the need for a device.

In one of the last books about Queen Elizabeth II, a book about her travels around the world, she was asked what changed the most in her exerience.

The Queen responded along the line that she used to see people, now all she saw were … little black boxes.

And I put it to you that even with the scene recorded and safely in your hand … any event is given contradictory interpretations or descriptions by the individuals involved, thereby providing different perspectives and points of view of the same incident.

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose inded.