8.9.2026 – to repudiate

to repudiate
Yalta, Marshall Plan, ties with
UN and NATO

“… the first issues that were going to come up in the Eighty-third Congress would be foreign policy issues, and in foreign policy the dominant Republicans in Congress (and in particular in the Senate, which would, because of its treaty-approving power, be the focus of foreign policy debate) were not Eisenhower’s natural allies but his natural enemies.

It was the support of the eastern, internationalist wing of the party that had given Ike the presidential nomination over Taft, but the Taft wing consisted mostly of Republicans from the Midwest, bedrock of isolationism.

The Ohioan’s midwestern allies — Jenner, Bourke Hickenlooper, Welker, Ferguson, Molly Malone — had yearned for years to dismantle the Roosevelt and Truman policies that the liberals thought were so wonderful.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

They would, Johnson was certain, move at once to repudiate Yalta, slash away at the Marshall Plan, and loosen or sever America’s ties with the United Nations and with NATO.

But Eisenhower was not merely a supporter of NATO; he had been commander of NATO.

Says George Reedy, who was down on the ranch with Johnson and was familiar with his thinking, Eisenhower “had actually spent most of… the preceding twenty or thirty years in virtual support of the foreign policies of Roosevelt and of Truman.

The Republicans … under Taft were opposed to that policy, [so] he and the congressional Republicans were just bound to be at loggerheads.”

All the Democrats had to do was “take advantage” of the situation.

Isolationism was back on Capitol Hill, and it was back strong. Journalists who remembered the America First Committee filling the Senate galleries in 1940 and 1941 saw what Richard Rovere called a “resurgent isolationism” in the way the galleries were filled in 1953 when Joe McCarthy was scheduled to speak.

The thunderclap of Pearl Harbor may have demolished in an instant the arguments of the Borahs and Nyes, the thunderclap of Hiroshima may have made it even clearer that in an age of nuclear weapons and modern air forces, the oceans were no longer moats; but those thunderclaps seem to have been heard only faintly in Senate Republican councils, in which the views of quite a sizable bloc (including, of course, the Republican leaders, the defiantly isolationist Taft and the suavely isolationist Bridges) sometimes seemed to resemble the views of the Republican senators who had helped Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. defeat the Treaty of Versailles.

From Master Of The Senate: The Years Of Lyndon Johnson by Robert A. Caro (Random House: New York, 2002).

And of course, Mr. Caro is writing about events in 1952.

The phrase that rang my bell?

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

I remember a chat in the early 2000’s about George W. Bush and the feller I was chatting with said something along the lines of “We thought we had our guy in there and he is such a disappointment.”

He was one of those fellers who felt the United States had no business, no defined role in any world affair – just stay home and take care of us.

That feller felt, their time had come at last.

They got behind George H.W. Bush.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

And H.W. Bush led the coalition of world powers against Saddam Hussein and watch the Soviet Union dissappear.

They got behind Ronald Reagan.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

And Reagan led the coalition of world powers to strengthen NATO and call on the Soviets to tear down that wall.

They got behind Richard Nixon.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

And Nixon stunned the coalition of world powers by establishing relations with the Peoples Republic of China.

And they got behind Ike.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

And, as Mr. Caro writes, “But Eisenhower was not merely a supporter of NATO; he had been commander of NATO …  Eisenhower “had actually spent most of… the preceding twenty or thirty years in virtual support of the foreign policies of Roosevelt and of Truman. Eisenhower ‘had actually spent most of… the preceding twenty or thirty years in virtual support of the foreign policies of Roosevelt and of Truman.“”

Prior to Ike were the years of Franklin Roosevelt.

The man who had been on office so, a good part of America thought his first name was President.

The man who was elected President 5 times but the last time he was elected, it was Harry Truman’s name on the ballet.

There is a strong school of political science that feels Truman’s surprise reelection was just that, the 5th time FDR won.

There was a joke that after FDR died, a Republican said to the Democrat … Who are going to vote for now? The Democrat replies, We’ll dig some one up … NO NO PLEASE.

Prior to FDR you have the 12 years of Harding, Coolidge and Hoover that led to that blip in history known as The Great Depression.

Good name though there was nothing great about it.

And before those three guys you have Woodrow Wilson.

When they said, their time had come at the last, they were thinking back to the time when the views of the Republican senators who … helped Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. defeat the Treaty of Versailles.

Defeat the Treaty of Versailles and Woodrow Wilson.

There was no winner in World War 1.

The world at war decided it was time to call it quits, arranged an armistice on Nov. 11th, 1918 and agreed to meet and work out a treaty to settle the game.

President Wilson showed up with 14 points for a peace plan that caused French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau to famously remark, “Even God only had 10.”

One of those points, which was accepted by other nations involved was the formation of the League of Nations where problems of international importance could be settled and, maybe, future wars avoided.

President Wilson brought the treaty to the United States Senate, the body that had to approve all treaties by a 2/3 vote.

Back then the United States Senate took its role as a part of the Government of The United States seriously.

That and the fact that that 2/3 vote meant that for anything to pass, you had to get votes from both sides.

It came close in a vote several times, but the Republican party controlled the Senate and every effort was made to reject the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations.

As a point of trivia, the United States of American and the German Empire did not official end World War 1 until August 21, 1921.

Another point of trivia is that in the election of 1918, the Republican Party won control of the Senate by 1 vote.

Had one seat in 1918 gone Democratic, the vote would have been tied and the Vice President would break the tie giving Democrats control on the Senate and the Senate Foreign Policy Committee.

That year Henry Ford of Ford Motor Company fame and supported of Woodrow Wilson ran for Senate in the State of Michigan.

He entered BOTH the Republican and Democratic Primaries (which was allowed back then) and had he won the primaries he would have be awarded the Senate Seat.

Ford lost the Republican primary and ran as a Democrat and lost the general election by 8,000 votes out of 430,000 votes cast.

Michigan sent Republican Truman Handy Newberry, former Secretary of the Navy to the Senate.

Republican’s organized the Senate by virtue of the 8,000 Michiganders who voted against Henry Ford and the League of Nations was formed without the United States.

The league clearly operated less effectively than it might have. Standing apart from the league also made it easier for the United States to turn inward over the next two decades and to view growing world crises as someone else’s problem. After Pearl Harbor, many Americans concluded that Wilson had been right—fueling support for what became the United Nations.

And here we are today.

Now, they felt, their time had come at last.

There IS nothing new under the sun, is there?

8.8.2026 – mercy’s quality

mercy’s quality
not strain’d – droppeth gentle as
the rain from heaven

The quality of mercy is not strain’d.

It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath.

It is twice blest:

It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.

‘Tis mightiest in the mightiest;

it becomes the thronèd monarch better than his crown.

His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,

The attribute to awe and majesty wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;

But mercy is above this sceptered sway.

It is enthronèd in the hearts of kings

The Merchant of Venice (act 4, scene 1) by William Shakespeare.

I enjoy the fact that some things have not changed since Big Bill’s time on earth.

Even today …

The quality of mercy is not strain’d.
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath.

It is twice blest:
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.

Yet even more.

That the quality of mercy still is to be marveled at as well as embraced, no one has said it any better than Big Bill did 500 years ago.

But mercy is above this sceptered sway.

This passage has been much on my mind of late.

Much on mind due to an avalanche of mercies that has embraced me and my family

Did I tell you about …?

Did I mention that …?

Then this happened …

Then that …

I would be a poor player to not acknowledge these mercies that dropped on us as the gentle rain from Heaven.

And that it is twice blest if not more for sure it blesseth him that gives and him that takes.

But also those who just hear about it.

I do not question this good fortune and it some cases, it’s just band aids and in some cases, it’s just an indication of band aids that might yet to come.

Still.

I have quoted this before.

In the 1st chronological book in the Hornblower series by CS Forester, Mr. Midshipman Hornblower, Mr. Forester has young Hornblower standing before three Captains who are examining him on his knowledge of seamanship before passing on his promotion to Lieutenant.

The three Captains present young Hornblower with an impossible situation and ask, as the man in charge, what would he do?

While Hornblower stammers out a reply, the Captains add even more impossible situations to the question.

All seems lost when the examination is interrupted by the sound of cannon shot and everyone races out of the room to deal with an emergency.

Afterwards Hornblower is told the exams are over for the time being with no decision on his case.

Young Hornblower is dejected and one of the Captain’s, Captain Foster addresses him.

‘Now lookee here, Mr Hornblower said Foster, turning upon him.

‘To the best of my recollection, you were flat aback, about to lose your spars and with Dover cliffs under your lee.

In one more minute you would have been failed – it was the warning gun that saved you.

Is not that so ?

… Then be thankful for small mercies. And even more thankful for big ones.

8.7.2026 – what if this road, that

For my brother Paul ….

what if this road, that
held no surprises decided not
go home after all

at all risks, who wants
to know a story’s end or
where a road will go

What if this road, that has held no surprises
these many years, decided not to go
home after all; what if it could turn
left or right with no more ado
than a kite-tail? What if its tarry skin
were like a long, supple bolt of cloth,
that is shaken and rolled out, and takes
a new shape from the contours beneath?
And if it chose to lay itself down
in a new way, around a blind corner,
across hills you must climb without knowing
what’s on the other side, who would not hanker
to be going, at all risks? Who wants to know
a story’s end, or where a road will go?

What if this road by Sheenagh Pugh, originally published in ‘Ids Hospit’ published by Seren Books (1997).

8.6.2026 – of course, tyranny

of course, tyranny
is the handmaiden of the
moneyed interests

Adapted from the article, The real meaning of Abdul El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan by Robert Reich, a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and a former US secretary of labor, in the Guardian (8/6/2026), where Secretary Reich writes:

Yet it’s big corporations and the billionaire class that are supporting Trump’s authoritarianism.

They’ve sucked up to Trump for corporate welfare, giant tax cuts, tariff exemptions, antitrust acquiescence and war contracts.

They’ve given Trump hundreds of millions for his inauguration, his ballroom, his 250th birthday, his Super Pac.

Trump’s tyranny and America’s affordability crisis are related.

When corporate America and Wall Street are unleashed – when the president of the United States has made an implicit deal with the moneyed interests to back him and his authoritarian regime in exchange for tax cuts, deregulation, monopolization and pay-to-play corruption – of course prices soar and wages stagnate.

Tyranny is the handmaiden of the moneyed interests.

The online Merriam-Webster defines tyranny as cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others.

The online Merriam-Webster defines handmaiden as something whose essential function is to serve or assist

So lets try that last statement over again.

Cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others is the essential function of the moneyed interests.

Or would it be …

Cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others is essential to the function of the moneyed interests.

Or would it be …

To serve or assist the moneyed interests is the essential function of cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others.

Any of the three by itself or all of them together at once works for me.

8.5.2026 – criterion of

criterion of
history is truth; motive
in its being true

Adapted from the passage:

There is nothing that more divides civilized from semi-savage man than to be conscious of our forefathers as they really were, and bit by bit to reconstruct the mosaic of the long-forgotten past. To weigh the stars, or to make ships sail in the air or below the sea, is not a more astonishing and ennobling performance on the part of the human race in these latter days, than to know the course of events that had been long forgotten, and the true nature of men and women who were here before us.

Truth is the criterion of historical study; but its impelling motive is poetic. Its poetry consists in its being true. There we find the synthesis of the scientific and literary views of history.

In English Social History by George Macaulay Trevelyan (Longmans, Green: New York and Toronto, 1942).

To weigh the stars,

or to make ships sail in the air or below the sea,

is not a more astonishing and ennobling performance on the part of the human race in these latter days,

than to know the course of events that had been long forgotten,

and the true nature of men and women who were here before us.

As written in Wikipedia, “What is perhaps most frequently forgotten, or ignored, is the skill of his literary craftsmanship. Trevelyan was a born writer and a natural storyteller; and this, among historians, is a rare gift … If one quality is to be singled out, is should be this, for all historians he is the poet of English history.”

There will come a time when what happened to the United States in the early 21st Century.

Someone will bit by bit reconstruct the mosaic of the long-forgotten past and say, “What happened here …”

I am reminded of the story of the feller interviewing the old businessman and asking, “You worked during the three martini lunch era? What was that like?”

And the businessman replied, “I can’t remember much but I’ll tell you this, nothing happened in the afternoon!

Angell Hall – University of Michigan – carved into the building above the columns it reads: Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.