11.1.2026 – asking wrong question

asking wrong question
instead of how much time left
how much of your mind

I digress to start, but I believe I am correct when I say that Prince is again recognized by that name today and not by the ‘Artist Formerly Known as Prince (TAFKAP), or simply the Artist.

I ask that as today, Prince joins my Pantheon of the Giants of Word Use, Big Bill, Mr. Sandburg, Hemingway, EB White; Et al) whose content I steal and work into a haiku.

The line I quote:

Instead of asking him how much of your time is left

Ask him how much of your mind, *

Popped into my brain while reading the Guest Essay Could A.I. Be Conscious? It’s Definitely Possible, Toni Sims, a researcher at the Center for Mind, Ethics and Policy at New York University.

Ms. Sims writes:

Of course, you can never know for sure whether a machine is conscious, just as you can never know for sure whether anyone is conscious other than yourself. As philosophers have long recognized, the only conscious experience each of us can directly observe is our own. Instead, we have to evaluate the consciousness of other beings indirectly, through an examination of the available evidence. We infer that our fellow humans are conscious because of our shared biological makeup, as well as how they behave and talk — including, notably, that they say they are conscious.

So while we will never be completely certain whether A.I. systems are conscious, we should still collect and weigh the evidence, because getting the question wrong carries serious risks. If we assume A.I. is not conscious when it actually is, we could end up abusing and neglecting vulnerable beings in enormous numbers — as I believe we do with animals. If we decide that A.I. is conscious when it really isn’t, we could end up misplacing our moral concern and abdicating control over what are, or should be, powerful tools that we can use to advance human and animal well-being.

Reading this piece, my objections boiled over like baking soda in vinegar as I sought the right words to say, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

I felt like I was losing my mind.

Maybe that’s what brought the words of Prince to mind.

And I focused on Instead of asking …

Instead of asking … Could A.I. be concious?

Ask .. Could A.I. have a soul?

And I am here to tell that the answer to that question is … NO!

Quoting Yeats, could A.I. write a poem that makes the soul clap its hands and sing, and louder sing?

Sure, I guess.

Could A.I. READ a poem that makes its soul clap its hands and sing, and louder sing?

NO!

A.I. and machines in general DO NOT HAVE A SOUL.

Years ago a toy came out called a gigapet which was tiny machine that needed attention in the way of pressing a button or two every couple of hours to ‘stay alive’.

My kids all had them and kept them going for most of a day.

They were MACHINES.

AI is a machine.

At the end of the day, we can turn them, we should turn them OFF.

I make it a point to tell co-workers that computers can be like dogs and sense fear and play on that with some users so it is important, from time to time, to unplug your computer and wave the end of the cord in front of your monitor.

I do worry that this conversation will go down the road of machines being conscious and then, somehow, having rights, having standing in court.

But always, ALWAYS, keep in mind, computers, AI, any machine, has no soul.

To the line, So while we will never be completely certain whether A.I. systems are conscious, we should still collect and weigh the evidence. I say I am certain.

I say we can uplug these machines without concern.

Unplug with impunity.

Unplug fearlessly.

Unplug with prejudice.

And for those days when the elevator tries to get you down ..

GO CRAZY!

Oh the thoughts that come with an extra hour of sleep due to the time change.

  • Complete quote:

    So when you call up that shrink in Beverly Hills
    You know the one, Dr. Everything’ll-Be-Alright
    Instead of asking him how much of your time is left
    Ask him how much of your mind, baby
    ‘Cause in this life
    Things are much harder than in the after world
    In this life
    You’re on your own
    And if de-elevator tries to bring you down
    Go crazy

10.29.2026 – we guess no angels

we guess no angels
are contented to be blind
things may not be seen

Adapted from the poem, The Jig of Forslin by Conrad Aiken (The Four Seas Company: Boston, 1916) in Part IV: (1) where Mr. Aiken writes:

Now, unless persuaded by searching music
Which suddenly opens the portals of the mind,
We guess no angels,
And are contented to be blind.
Let us blow silver horns in the twilight.
And lift our hearts to the yellow star in the green,
To find, perhaps, if while the dew is rising,
Clear things may not be seen.

Stuck in the loop.

Do over.

Do over.

Do over.

Do loop.

Do loop.

Loop.

Death spiral.

Never ends.

Now, unless persuaded by searching music

Which suddenly opens the portals of the mind,

We guess no angels,

And are contented to be blind.

Let us blow silver horns in the twilight.

And lift our hearts to the yellow star in the green,

To find, perhaps, if while the dew is rising,

Clear things may not be seen.

10.16.2026 – all the voyage of

all the voyage of
their life is bound in shallows
and in miseries …

Adapted from the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare.

In Act 4, Scene 3, Big Bill’s has this passage spoken by Brutus.

There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;


Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat,

And we must take the current when it serves

Or lose our ventures.

So so so many times I have heard the words:

This is it …

Now he has gone too far …

The Courts can stop him now …

The Proscutors can stop him now …

Congress can stop him now …

And nothing.

Now we look to an election 18 days away.

We are being told this is where it will stop.

This is where it will stop because there is a tide in the affairs of men
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat,

And we must take the current when it serves

Or lose our ventures.

Hilton Head Island Atlantic Coast at high tide …

10.12.2026 – never be idle

never be idle
or bored, have to take refuge
in the modern age

On November 18, 1948, Winston Churchill received an honorary Doctor of Literature degree from the University of London during its Foundation Day.

In his response to the award, Mr. Churchill said:

The university education is a guide to the reading of a lifetime.

We should impress upon those who have its advantages the importance of reading the great books of the world and the literature of one’s own country.

One who has profited from university education has a wide choice.

He need never be idle or bored and have to take refuge in the clack and clatter of the modern age, which requires something new not only every day, but every two or three hours of the day.

There is a good saying, which you may have heard before, that when a new book comes out you should read an old one, though I perhaps should not recommend too rigid an application.

Reading something new … every two or three hours of the day.

Sounds about right.

As for the clack and clatter of the modern age …

10.10.2026 – was hugely impressed

was hugely impressed
name every species of bird
tattooed on her leg

Every once in awhile, I have to take a break from pointing out that the king has no clothes on and other aspects of trying to save the world and just goof off.

Readers of these essays know that a regular part of my Saturday morning reading is the Blind Date column in the Guardian where the, as the paper says, we fix up two Guardian readers.

The paper selects two readers who have requested a Blind Date and set them up at some posh restaurant for a free dinner.

Participants are asked to respond to a list of questions after the date and their responses are cobbled into the weekly column.

I am drawn to their responses as well as to the menu at these posh restaurants as well as the opportunity for me, while writing this down, to use the word, posh.

In today’s column, Holly, 42, a horticulturist, meets Graeme, 47, a forest manager, went on a Blind Date and when asked the question, “What were you hoping for?“, Holly responded, To meet someone interesting and fun, while Graeme (also love to guess how some of the names are pronounced) responded, Really, just a fun night with minimal awkwardness was my fairly low expectation before the meeting.

To the question, “What do you think Holly made of you?”, Graeme said, “I reckon she was hugely impressed I could name every species of bird she had tattooed on her leg.”

Talk about answers to questions that ask more questions than they answer.

Remember, this is the feller, Graeme (see in the way terms of address for Grandparent’s come about, my wife is Grammy, but I digress) said he was hoping for a fun night with minimal awkwardness.

Yet somehow he managed to examine his date’s leg, tick off and identify the species of bird tattooed on her leg, while seated (I guess … or was this later) in a posh restaurant.

If you look at the photo with the article, it shows that Holly’s arms are covered with species identifiable tattoos of birds, but does not show her leg.

Graeme and Holly on their date …

Then asked, “Most awkward moment?“, Graeme said, Holly destroying an aphid, which had landed on my forehead, with a firm thumb squish. I should make clear that the poor aphid wasn’t in the lovely restaurant; it was outside an entirely different place, which had hanging baskets.

Not, I point out, checking out his date’s leg … but maybe that wasn’t in the lovely restaurant.

Maybe we just leave this right there.

I will say that Graeme, when asked if they would meet again that he was hugely looking forward to doing so (though it must be pointed out that Holly said, We live quite far apart, but we’ll see …)

So Graeme is out there, hugely attracted to the adverb, hugely, and we will hope for the best for him and Holly as we go forward on our own with our own efforts to enjoy life with with minimal awkwardness.

As a postscript, the restaurant, The Palmerston in Edinburgh, did not disappoint.

Our couple, in their effort to enjoy a fun night with minimal awkwardness were hugely rewarded with a menu that offered such delights as:

Pappardelle, summer girolles, tomatoes, basil, goat’s curd and parmesan
Goat’s curd, friggitelli peppers, basil and pine nuts on toast
Burrata, roast black figs, honey, hazelnuts and Marsala
Grilled squid, cucumber, grilled peppers and tomatoes
Pig’s skin ragu and parmesan on toast
Berkshire pig head salad, dandelion, radishes, shallots and sweet mustard dressing

And for dessert:

Uva fragola sorbet
Alp Blossom and membrillo (Bavaria, Germany, unpasteurised cow’ s milk)
Sinodun Hill, strawberries and honey (Carmarthenshire,Wales, pasteurised goat’s milk)

Hugely.

I like that word.