3.31.2021 – alternative lives

alternative lives,
might appeal at moments of
claustrophobia

Adapted from the book, A Week at the Airport: A Heathrow Diary (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

The lack of detail about the destinations served only to stir unfocused images of nostalgia and longing: Tel Aviv, Tripoli, St Petersburg, Miami, Muscat via Abu Dhabi, Algiers, Grand Cayman via Nassau … all of these promises of alternative lives, to which we might appeal at moments of claustrophobia and stagnation.

Part of the series of Haiku inspired by from A Week at the Airport: A Heathrow Diary (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton. I discovered this book entirely by accident. When searching for books online, I will use the term ‘collections’ and see what turns up. I figure that someone who has taken the time to gather together the etexts of any one author to create a collected works folder is enough for me to see what this author might be all about.

In this case I came across the writing of Alain de Botton. I enjoyed his use of language very much. Much of the words he strings together lend themselves to what I do.

As for his book, I recommend it very much though written in 2009, it misses the added layer of travel under covid but still the picture of the modern airport is worth the read.

3.30.2021 – place never return

place never return
resulting from rare conjunctions
season, light, weather

Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

A dominant impulse on encountering beauty is to wish to hold on to it, to possess it and give it weight in one’s life. There is an urge to say, ‘I was here, I saw this and it mattered to me.’

But beauty is fugitive, being frequently found in places to which we may never return or else resulting from rare conjunctions of season, light and weather.

How then to possess it, how to hold on to the floating train, the halvalike bricks or the English valley?

The camera provides one option. Taking photographs can assuage the itch for possession sparked by the beauty of a place; our anxiety over losing a precious scene can decline with every click of the shutter.

According to the website, GOOD READS, Any Baedeker will tell us where we ought to travel, but only Alain de Botton will tell us how and why.

As I said in the section on Architecture , what I find irresistible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, hey, I would.

** More from the category TRAVEL — click here

3.29.2001 – large ideas about

large ideas about
intelligence kindness, youth
or serenity

Adapted from the book, The Architecture of Happiness (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

It may be easy to laugh at the grandiloquence of claims directed at objects which on occasion resemble giant earplugs or upturned lawnmowers. But, instead of accusing critics of reading too much into too little, we should allow abstract sculptures to demonstrate to us the range of thoughts and emotions that every kind of non-representational object can convey. The gift of the most talented sculptors has been to teach us that large ideas, for example, about intelligence or kindness, youth or serenity, can be communicated in chunks of wood and string, or in plaster and metal contraptions, as well as they can in words or in human or animal likenesses. The great abstract sculptures have succeeded in speaking to us, in their peculiar dissociated language, of the important themes of our lives.

According the The New York Review of Books, this is “A perceptive, thoughtful, original, and richly illustrated exercise in the dramatic personification of buildings of all sorts.”

What I find irrestible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, I would.

3.28.2021 – busy with nothing

busy with nothing
time weighs heavy on my hands
why I like the beach

I decided something.

After 20 years in online news, I no longer know how to relax.

After 20 years of never being ‘off’ the job.

After 20 years of always being ‘on’ the job.

I find myself thinking I should be doing something.

When recent weather cycles went across the country, I gratefully thought I had no part to play.

But then what?

I really enjoy going to beach.

Something happens to me there.

Not just mental but physical.

I hate cold feet.

My dresser drawer is filled with thick thick socks.

I have a collection of thick slippers.

I like to wear cowboy boots because they keep my ankles from drafts.

I keep a room heater on the floor by my feet.

What will keep my feet warm is among my first questions each day.

Then I go to the beach.

I go to the beach in sandals (me? sandals?).

And they don’t stay on very long.

Barefoot in the sand.

Barefoot in the ocean.

I should be freezing.

Thinking about it makes me cold.

Thinking about it makes me shudder and shake and shiver.

Doing it?

I don’t feel the cold.

My toes dig into the sand and make patterns and it almost someone else’s feet.

If I could stand having all those electrodes and such stuck to my head, I would love to see what a brain scan shows when my feet are cold and when my feet are not cold at the beach.

Something in shifts the gears in my brain at the beach.

And when I am at the beach I am at the beach.

I am not doing nothing.

I am at the beach.

I am occupied.

I am busy being at the beach.

I am keeping myself busy.

It’s my job now.

At least part of my job.

I get paid partly to get the beach experience online somehow.

So I have to experience the beach.

It IS my job!

I am at the beach.

3.27.2021 – Beverly Cleary

Beverly Cleary
for Henry, Ribsy, Beezus
Thank you very much

The other day I wrote about how a book I was reading made me laugh out loud.

I clearly remember the first time a book I was reading made me laugh, I mean really laugh, not the polite guffaw, but the unable to suppress hilarity and I don’t care who knows it laugh.

It was in 4th grade and I was reading to myself.

If I was reading to myself in 4th grade there is a good chance it was during a time I was supposed to be doing something else.

Most likely arithmetic.

If I was reading, I was being quiet.

Me being quiet was not a state of affairs that any teacher wanted to interrupt.

I was happy.

She was happy.

I was reading the book Henry and Beezus by Beverly Cleary.

Most likely the book was tucked inside my arithmetic book.

Henry was in a crowd at a bike auction with his friend Beezus and her little sister, the now very famous Ramona.

At that time in literary history, Ramona was still a footnote and not a defining character.

I was rolling through the words and could feel the hot crowd of sullen people gathered at a Police Auction of old bikes.

I was there at the auction for all intents and purposes.

I certainly was not following along with the arithmetic lesson.

Henry and Beezus and I were stuck in the crowd, surrounded by tall adults with no room to see.

All seemed hopeless in the airless, hot crowd.

When Ramona yells out, “I am going to throw up!”

Have you seen or experienced something so funny that you lose yourself in the humor of the situation?

Laughter burst out of me with the same explosiveness as if I HAD thrown up.

Maybe the fact that I suffered from ‘barfphobia’ the fear of throwing up in public made it extra funny.

I was there and I heard and saw the crowd react, which was to get out of the way and get out of the way quick.

I laughed and laughed.

And laughed and laughed.

This is where the magic that followed me my whole life steps into the story.

After a bit the mists cleared and I came back to the classroom.

I realized someone was calling, “Mr. Hoffman?”

It was my teacher.

My teacher, at the time ‘Miss’ Critchell, who later became a very dear friend, was looking at me.

“Well”

The arithmetic lesson had stopped.

Everyone in class had stopped.

Everyone was looking at me.

Everyone could see that I had a book open inside my arithmetic book.

But it was too funny.

I could see and hear Ramona and I could feel just the way Henry felt.

“Oh that Ramona,” I said out loud.

“She had to throw up!”

Miss Critchell wanted to laugh.

Miss Critchell tried really had to not laugh.

But I could tell, she wanted to laugh.

Maybe she remembered reading this part of the book.

I was in for it I knew.

“Why don’t you close your book and join us for bit,” said Miss Critchell.

No hallway.

No sentences.

No appointment to see the Principal.

I put Henry and Beezus into my desk and life went on.

And I can remember the relief like it was yesterday.

I read all the Henry Huggins books.

I read them all several times.

Had I known I would have made a mark on the inside cover like I did later with “The Caine Mutiny” to know how many times I had read them.

Somehow Beverly Cleary really understood the way kids brains worked.

Why a kid wanted a bike.

Why a boy could not ride a girls bike.

Why a clubhouse was the single most cool thing, after a tree house, any kid could every want.

According to Wikipedia, “As a children’s librarian, Cleary empathized with her young patrons, who had difficulty finding books with characters they could identify with, and she struggled to find enough books to suggest that would appeal to them. After a few years of making recommendations and performing live storytelling in her role as librarian, Cleary decided to start writing children’s books about characters that young readers could relate to. Cleary has said, “I believe in that ‘missionary spirit’ among children’s librarians. Kids deserve books of literary quality, and librarians are so important in encouraging them to read and selecting books that are appropriate.”

See that line, decided to start writing children’s books about characters that young readers could relate to?

I knew every kid in the Henry Huggins books.

I hated and feared Scooter.

I really like Beezus.

Was I Ramona?

They were all my friends.

Ernest Hemingway wrote something along the line of if what you write becomes part of the collective experience of the reader, you are indeed a writer.

TO THIS DAY I think the first bite of any apple tastes the best.

And WHY?

In the book Beezus and Ramona, Beezus hears a CHOMP … bump bump bump.

She investigates and finds Ramona by a crate of apples surrounded by a dozens of apples on the floor.

Each apple has one bite taken out of it.

As Beezus watches, Ramona selects an apple and bites it, CHOMP, and drops it, bump bump bump.

Ramona looks at Beezus and says, “You know how the first bite tastes best?”

The thought became part of my collective consciousness.

Using the Hemingway test, Ms. Cleary was indeed a writer.

Ms. Cleary it was announced Friday, has died.

She was 104.

She was named a Living Legend in 2000 by the Library of Congress. In 2003, she was chosen as one of the winners of the National Medal of Arts and met George W Bush. Her books have won awards, and she is lauded in literary circles far and wide.

In and interview she once said, “By sixth or seventh grade, “I decided that I was going to write children’s stories,” she said.”

I hope she knew how much I enjoyed her books.

They are a river that ran though my life.

And I am grateful for it.

Thank you very much.

3.26.2021 – words far from perfect

words far from perfect
words needed to hear myself
words as an escape

I laughed out loud while reading for the first time in a long time last night.

By chance I came across the book, “Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things” by Jenny Lawson.

I had no idea what I was getting into.

I thought maybe it was a look at all the terrible goofy things that happened in history by accident.

Warren G. Harding, Nancy Reagan and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.

Those type of things.

It turned out to be a collection of essays about one person’s on going battle with depression and anxiety.

It is a book that defiantly draws outside the lines.

The book is profane, loud, brash, sensitive, apologetic and non-apologetic all at the same time.

Somehow Ms. Lawson is able to describe, comment and explain depression in a way that I can only step back and admire.

And laugh.

And feel like crying.

Maybe seems cold hearted to even imagine saying that or saying that anyone could write about such an awful thing in a way that makes you laugh.

But there it is.

Read the essay early in the book about dealing with insomnia and how Ms. Lawson was trying to to get her cat … well you will have to read it for yourself.

If you don’t laugh, well, that’s fine.

But I laughed.

Ms. Lawson hit a nerve for me when she wrote that she writes words that she needs to hear.

I like that.

I liked that a lot.

Maybe its a crack in the ice of my writers block.

Just words that I needed to hear.

I really like that.

To add to that, Ms. Lawson is also right there with making up her own words when existing words don’t work.

Witness her footnote for Concoctulary: “... a word that I just made up for words that you have to invent because they didn’t yet exist. It’s a portmanteau of “concocted” and “vocabulary.” I was going to call it an “imaginary” (as a portmanteau of “imagined” and “dictionary”) but turns out that the word “imaginary” was already concoctularied, which is actually fine because “concoctulary” sounds sort of unintentionally dirty and is also great fun to say. Try it for yourself. Con-COC-chew-lary. It sings.”

It sings.

I love that.

Early in the book, Ms. Lawson writes “If this sentence seems confusing it’s probably because you skipped over the author’s note at the beginning like everyone else in the world does. Go back and read it because it’s important.”

This kind of freaked me out as I have been having a long discussion with myself of late of whether or not to read the forward to a book.

So far in life I have ignored forwards pretty much.

Somewhere someone I figured if it was important to the topic, the author would have found a way to get it in the book.

Or it was just a place for the author to say thanks to the girlfriend (this can be dangerous – See Garrison Keillor’s 1st book) or the person who typed the manuscript or the people who told the author that the concept was worthwhile and they should follow their dream.)

In this case I noticed the ‘Note from the Author’ but I skipped it.

Feeling like Ms. Lawson noticed personally, I skipped back and read it.

Had to read it a couple of times.

A lot of people close to me are talking about depression and anxiety in their lives and in the lives around them.

My heart goes out to all of them.

I wish I could I help.

So does Ms. Lawson.

Ms. Lawson is angry about this.

Ms. Lawson writes, “found myself really angry. Angry that life can throw such curveballs at you. Angry at the seeming unfairness of how tragedy is handed out. Angry because I had no other emotions left to give.

What struck me over and over again is the personal nature of it all.

You can be aware.

You can want to help.

You can empathize.

You can sypmpathize.

You can experience some of this all on your own.

BUT NO and I MEAN NO ONE can understand what you are feeling.

Ms. Lawson calls it, “Imagine having a disease so overwhelming that your mind causes you to want to murder yourself. Imagine having a malignant disorder that no one understands.

In very real battles with depression and anxiety, its one on one.

Ms. Lawson writes, “When cancer sufferers fight, recover, and go into remission we laud their bravery. We wear ribbons to celebrate their fight. We call them survivors. Because they are.

When depression sufferers fight, recover, and go into remission we seldom even know, simply because so many suffer in the dark … ashamed to admit something they see as a personal weakness … afraid that people will worry, and more afraid that they won’t. We find ourselves unable to do anything but cling to the couch and force ourselves to breathe.

Ms. Lawson writes that she decided to fight back.

She states, “I’ve HAD IT. I AM GOING TO BE FURIOUSLY HAPPY, OUT OF SHEER SPITE.” (Emphasis in the original)

One on one.

So where do we or any other people come in.

Ms. Lawson does not come right and say it.

In fact she reinforces the one on one struggle.

So doesn’t ever seem to come out and say, “if you know some one like this” or “if you want to help…”

But in the background of the book is her husband Victor.

No matter what he seems to be there.

No matter what happens he seems to be there.

No matter.

He really must love her.

I am sure there are words and things said and regretted but in the end, they are together.

I guess you call it unconditional love.

I am sure things happen but they go one.

Ms. Lawson fights her battles.

And she fights alone.

But she knows there will be someone there this afternoon, tonight and tomorrow.

And they go one.

If that isn’t how it turns out, I don’t want to know.

It is an awful way to suffer all alone.

It is awful to watch and feel helpless to help.

If I can tell myself that I can do something and that something is just be there, I will grab on to that.

Near the end of the back, Ms. Lawson writes, ” ... That’s what we do for people we love.”

I laud their bravery.

I wear ribbons to celebrate their fight.

I call them survivors.

Because they are.

And I love them, unconditionally, very much.

3.25.2021 – low tide waves slide high

low tide waves slide high
rolling long wide water thins
washing up retreats

Part of a series based on afternoons spent at the beach on Hilton Head Island.

I wanted to see if I would be ‘inspired’ by what I saw, by what I heard, by what I smelled, by what I tasted, what I felt emotionally and what I felt tactilely.

Some turned out okay.

Some were too forced.

Some were just bad.

Some did involve some or all of those feelings.

As far as it goes, I guess I was inspired by by what I saw, by what I heard, by what I smelled, by what I tasted, what I felt emotionally and what I felt tactilely.

Click here for more Haiku from the BEACH

3.24.2021 – old arguments

old arguments
never die but neither do
they just fade away

They tell this story along the lines of one time manager of the Baltimore Orioles, Earl Weaver.

There this one umpire, and it may have been Ron Luciano but it could have been any one of the American League umpires at the time Weaver was a manager.

The story went that both Weaver and the Umpire had been rookies, rookie manager and rookie umpire, years before in the then Eastern Minor League.

Weaver managed the Elmira Pioneers.

Both Weaver and the Umpire went on to the Major Leagues.

From 1968 to 1982, Weaver managed the Orioles.

At some point over that span, Weaver and this Umpire came together again.

This Umpire has a bad day with Weaver and Weaver is tossed from the game.

Weaver is beside himself.

Weaver tosses his hat.

Weaver does his trademark move of kicking dirt on the umpire.

Weaver stalks off the field and into dugout.

When Weaver got to the dugout steps he stops, turns and yells one last thing at the ump.

“AND YOU MISSED THAT CALL BACK IN ELMIRA, TOO!”

In the movie, Citizen Kane, Jedediah Leland, the character played by Joseph Cotton, says to the reporter, “I can remember everything. That’s my curse, young man. It’s the greatest curse that’s ever been inflicted on the human race: memory.

Tell me about it.

3.23.2021 – embodied order

embodied order
cooperation among
same time tedium

Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

I began word-painting.

Descriptive passages came most readily: the offices were tall; the top of one tower was like a pyramid; it had ruby-red lights on its side; the sky was not black but an orangey-yellow.

But because such a factual description seemed of little help to me in pinning down why I found the scene so impressive, I attempted to analyse its beauty in more psychological terms.

The power of the scene appeared to be located in the effect of the night and of the fog on the towers.

Night drew attention to facets of the offices that were submerged in the day.

Lit by the sun, the offices could seem normal, repelling questions as effectively as their windows repelled glances.

But night upset this claim to normality, it allowed one to see inside and wonder at how strange, frightening and admirable they were.

The offices embodied order and cooperation among thousands, and at the same time regimentation and tedium.

A bureaucratic vision of seriousness was undermined, or at least questioned, by the night.

One wondered in the darkness what the flipcharts and office terminals were for: not that they were redundant, just that they might be stranger and more dubitable than daylight had allowed us to think.

Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton.

According to the website, GOOD READS, Any Baedeker will tell us where we ought to travel, but only Alain de Botton will tell us how and why.

As I said in the section on Architecture , what I find irresistible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, hey, I would.

** More from the category TRAVEL — click here

3.22.2021 – at first have viewed

at first have viewed
aesthetically even
mechanically

I based this haiku and several others like it from the writing in the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

On entering a new space, our sensitivity is directed towards a number of elements, which we gradually reduce in line with the function we find for the space. Of the four thousand things there might be to see and reflect on in a street, we end up being actively aware of only a few: the number of humans in our path, perhaps, the amount of traffic and the likelihood of rain. A bus that we might at first have viewed aesthetically or mechanically—or even used as a springboard to thoughts about communities within cities—becomes simply a box to move us as rapidly as possible across an area that might as well not exist, so unconnected is it to our primary goal, outside of which all is darkness, all is invisible.

*Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton.According to the website, GOOD READS, Any Baedeker will tell us where we ought to travel, but only Alain de Botton will tell us how and why.

As I said in the section on Architecture , what I find irresistible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

To also quote myself, I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

And to reemphasize, neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, hey, I would.

** More from the category TRAVEL — click here