9.15.2021 – be stranger, more

be stranger, more
dubitable than daylight
allowed us to think

Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

I began word-painting.

Descriptive passages came most readily: the offices were tall; the top of one tower was like a pyramid; it had ruby-red lights on its side; the sky was not black but an orangey-yellow.

But because such a factual description seemed of little help to me in pinning down why I found the scene so impressive, I attempted to analyse its beauty in more psychological terms.

The power of the scene appeared to be located in the effect of the night and of the fog on the towers.

Night drew attention to facets of the offices that were submerged in the day.

Lit by the sun, the offices could seem normal, repelling questions as effectively as their windows repelled glances.

But night upset this claim to normality, it allowed one to see inside and wonder at how strange, frightening and admirable they were.

The offices embodied order and cooperation among thousands, and at the same time regimentation and tedium.

A bureaucratic vision of seriousness was undermined, or at least questioned, by the night.

One wondered in the darkness what the flipcharts and office terminals were for: not that they were redundant, just that they might be stranger and more dubitable than daylight had allowed us to think.

Adapted from the book, The Art of Travel (2002, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton.

According to the website, GOOD READS, Any Baedeker will tell us where we ought to travel, but only Alain de Botton will tell us how and why.

As I said in the section on Architecture , what I find irresistible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, hey, I would.

** More from the category TRAVEL — click here

9.13.2021 – We learn to defend

We learn to defend
or attack a concept or
an ethical stance

We learn to defend of attack.

We know what’s right and what’s is wrong.

By some innate sense?

Or by what we learn?

Or by what we are taught?

And still call it ethics?

Adapted from the book, The Architecture of Happiness (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

Arguments about what is beautiful emerge as no easier to resolve, but then again no harder, than disputes about what is wise or right. We can learn to defend or attack a concept of beauty in the same way we might defend or attack a legal position or an ethical stance. We can understand, and publically explain, why we believe a building to be desirable or offensive on the basis of the things it talks to us about.

According the The New York Review of Books, this is “A perceptive, thoughtful, original, and richly illustrated exercise in the dramatic personification of buildings of all sorts.”

What I find irrestible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, I would.

9.11.2021 – history calling

history calling
nine one one nine eleven
wake up hangover

Conspiracy theory or not, the fact that the numbers in 9/11 and 911 has to be one of the oddest, cruelest and yet most perfect coincidences in history.

For me, it supersedes the coincidence that the abbreviation for the United States is US.

E pluibus unum and all that all at once.

It has been 20 years since 9/11.

It was the great chronicler of the American Scene, Tom Wolfe, (About whom, William F. Buckley Jr., writing in National Review, said, “he can do more things with words than anyone else.”) who wrote that after the excesses of the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s and 90’s, the first two decades of the 21st century would be one massive hangover.

I am having trouble this morning tracking down the exact quote.

When I find it, I will update this essay.

I put it to you that the idea of a 20 year hangover starting in the year 2000 to be pitch perfect spot on for the way this century has started.

The idea that 9/11/2001 was the wake call has some worth to it.

That loud ringing phone wake up call when you start your day with a headachy hangover.

Now, 20 years later, maybe its time to get out of bed, rub our head, drink a glass of icy cold water then go for long walk on a 90 degree 90% humidity day and sweat it all out.

As Mr. Lincoln said, “As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.

It is not “can any of us imagine better?” but, “can we all do better?”

We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.

I just have to wonder, how did Mr. Lincoln get so smart?

9.10.2021 – nations building blocks

nations’ building blocks
maybe not what always thought
RIGHT on schedule

I have always wanted to be a history teacher.

Much like Fonzie in Happys Days when Fonzie said he wanted to be a cop because, “It was one of the few jobs that paid you to ride a motorcycle,” being a history teacher would let me have an audience and tell funny stories and get paid but without needing a cover charge or two drink minimum.

Lots of friends and family have told me I would have been a good history teacher and they would have taken my class.

I even had a professor tell me she would take my class.

Take my class for revenge, she said, but that’s another story.

Had I been a history teacher I would have said that from the beginning this nation, the United States of America was built upon the block that are the words Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence when Mr. Jefferson wrote, We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.

It has come to me during these recent events that I was wrong.

If I was teaching today I would have to say that this nation was built on the block of words that says, “No one is going to tell me what to do.”

Lets start back in the days of colonial settlement.

Who settled British North America?

Protestants.

PROTESTants.

People who weren’t happy with things, some of those things being religious based, in Britain.

But mainly, people who weren’t happy.

Crabby, unhappy people, who didn’t really like anyone or anything and when you came right down to it, people who didn’t want anyone to be able to tell them what to do.

Britain had a great response.

Don’t like it here?

Leave.

Oddly enough France took the exact opposite approach.

To apply for a visa or whatever you needed back in the 1700’s to leave France and move to Quebec, you had to be a good citizen, a good Catholic and support the King.

Louie the whatever sent off his good subjects and when the revolution happened it happened in France.

George got rid of the complainers and when the revolution happened, it happened in North America.

Those Protestants got here and started to protest.

The British went into New England.

What kind of British?

British PROTESTants.

The Dutch went into New Amsterdam.

What kind of Dutch?

Dutch PROTESTants.

The French, New France having been taken by old France, went into Savannah and Charleston.

What kind of French?

French Huguenot PROTESTants.

All a bunch of angry people, leaving there homeland in protest.

They all had a couple of things in common.

They were crabby.

The Indians had to go.

AND ….

No one was going to tell them what to do.

These people were here for a couple of hundred years and suddenly Great Britain asked them to pay taxes.

Seems that pushing those Indians out made the Indians kind of mad and Great Britain had to maintain forts along the frontier to protect the crabby colonists.

And those forts cost money.

It made sense to the Brits that those crabby colonists ought to help pay.

I think we all know how that turned out.

Taxes?

Taxes!

That hit those PROTESTants right where they lived.

Protests started.

Flags with snakes and the words, ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ came out.

Boston even had a tea party!

The tea party made the Brits so mad they closed the port of Boston.

Those crabby colonist called that what?

INTORABLE!

We aren’t going to tolerate that!

We aren’t going to stand for that!

No one is going to tell us what to do!

(Anything about this sound at all familiar?)

So the colonists began that great American tradition of board meetings and held a Continental Congress.

So much for manifest destiny I guess.

Like most board meetings it took two years for them to figure out what to do but an independent nation came about.

Not, as Mr. Lincoln said, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

But conceived in protest and dedicated to the proposition that no one is going to tell us what do.

With the country off and whining and with a win under their belts its no small wonder that we turned on ourselves.

Slavery for some was the ultimate in someone telling someone else what to do.

The south didn’t see it that way as they were ones telling someone else what to do.

But it just bit the north in the butt that those southerners were getting away with that.

And if slaves could be told what to do, it was just one short step or slip along the way to other people trying to tell the north what to do.

It was the thin of the wedge argument.

When it came to slavery, well sir, no one was going to tell the south what they could and could not do with their slaves.

This was the political question that dominated America for 60 years.

Folks got so worked over it that they would rather wreck the country as they knew it just so long as no one was going to tell them what to do.

The people in the south would rather leave then be told to give up slaves or give up their states rights to keep their slaves, depending on who you were talking to.

The north would just as soon let the south leave if they were going to keep their slaves.

‘Wayward Sisters – Go in Peace’, was the slogan of many in the north.

But along came possibly the single most unelectable candidate for President in history.

At least until Bill Clinton convinced Ross Perot to run in 1992 and take 20% of the Republican vote but I digress.

Abraham Lincoln, nominated as just the 2nd Presidential candidate by the young Republican party was guaranteed to lose.

Unless the Democrats, who outnumbered Republicans 2 to 1, did something really really dumb.

And so they did.

The Democrats split in half and Mr. Lincoln won and the country split in half but Mr. Lincoln said the country, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, was bigger than any stupid argument.

Mr. Lincoln said it in such a way that all those crabby protesters looked a lot of stupid and they stuck their hands in their pockets and kicked the floor and said, ‘ah geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee’ but they went along with Mr. Lincoln and put the country back together.

Somehow Mr. Lincoln had a way of saying stuff that made folks want to be less petty and to grow up and even get along for a bit.

Maybe appealing to “the better angels of our nature” did work.

But that didn’t make them like it.

Also there was now a history of letting the country go to pieces so long as no one told the people in the country what to do.

And that thought stayed there in the back of their minds.

And every once in awhile that thought comes back.

Those folks were always there.

The right.

The far right.

The reactionaries.

The thin end of the wedge – next thing they will be at the door – no one is going to tell me what to do far reactionary protesting right.

In the north, this group stayed in with the Republican party not that they liked that very much.

In the south, they stayed with the Democratic party and more or less figured out that as long they kept their mouths shut they could think and do what they wanted which they did.

Up north they fumed and sputtered anytime it looked like someone was going to tell them what to do.

When Theodore Roosevelt decided that the country missed him as President and tried to come back, there was a faction in the Republican Party that would rather lose then let TR tell them what to do and they lost.

The reactionary far right faction stuck with Big Bill Taft and lost and lost big in every way.

Neither here no there but President Taft once stood on the veranda of Kent Country Club and was heard to say, “What a tremendous view,” before he went in to lunch, but I digress.

Then came TR’s cousin Frank.

Frank loved telling everyone what to do.

And this reactionary far right faction hated Frank.

They tried everything and everyone they could to stop Frank until Frank finally died.

Frank had been President so long, an entire generation grew up thinking his first name was President.

Many historian’s feel that Frank was elected FIVE times.

It just happened that Harry Truman’s name was on the ballot the fifth time but Frank still won.

And that just burned up that reactionary far right faction.

The reactionary far right faction found a man in Robert Taft.

Robert Taft was Bill Taft’s son.

Robert Taft was known as Mr. Republican.

Robert Taft was crabby, didn’t like anyone and wasn’t going to let anyone tell him what to do.

The reactionary far right faction knew he should be their candidate but they also knew he couldn’t win.

They wanted to win so bad that they turned to man who beat Hitler.

They all liked IKE.

But Ike wasn’t one of them and a lot of the reactionary far right faction were not really happy with Ike.

Which was okay with Ike as he wasn’t really happy with most of the reactionary far right faction.

Ike was not the voice that the reactionary far right faction wanted to hear.

The reactionary far right faction found a voice in Joe McCarthy.

This is the feller who more or less lost his voice when he was quietly asked, “At long lost, sir, do you have no decency?”

(Isn’t this scary?)

Ike retired and the reactionary far right faction turned to his Vice President, Richard Nixon.

A card carrying member of the reactionary far right faction.

But JFK had better hair, a better tan and a cooler accent and he squeaked by Nixon in the 1960 election.

This really pissed off the reactionary far right faction and they proclaimed that the next time, come hell or high water, they would pick candidate.

It wasn’t hell or high water but LBJ who came along and the reactionary far right faction candidate, Barry Goldwater set a record for losing that would last until Walter Mondale.

As a side note, Barry had a great smile that my Mom loved and my little brother Pete ended up with Barry for a middle name.

This is really getting long so lets move along quickly.

Ronald Reagan is elected and he is calm enough and cool enough that the reactionary far right faction sits tight.

RR might not have been Lincoln but he could still get the reactionary far right faction to look a lot of stupid and stick their hands in their pockets and kick the floor and said, ‘ah geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee’ and behave for a bit.

Now we get 9/11 and that reactionary far right faction starts getting loud.

The pot is back on the stove so to speak.

The Tea Party shows up.

Loud mouthed voices taking up the cause of the reactionary far right faction are being heard louder and louder as social media and cell phones arrive on the scene.

Not only do we have access to news and misinformation 24×7, we also carry in OUR HANDS the means to access this information 24×7.

No more listening to the radio when a radio is available.

No more watching TV when we are in front of a TV.

But a mind blowing assault on our minds blown by the ourselves carrying the phones and internet access everywhere we go.

No opinion not expressed.

No thought not given to words.

No time given to think about what is being said.

That flag is back warning, “don’t tread on me.”

Terrorists.

Climate change.

Police.

Crime.

As if we are inside of circle of people with baseball bats and the people are taking a turn to smack us with the bat.

Then on top everything we get flu.

For some, the only thing that makes sense is to yell the words that should have been carved on the liberty bell.

No one is going to tell me what to do!

No one can tell us to get a shot.

No one can tell us to wear a mask.

We don’t care if it splits the country.

We don’t care.

No one is going to tell us what to do.

No one is going to tell me what to do.

Me!

Well, I can understand.

I can sympathize.

It’s who we are.

Aristotle once said, or at least is credited with saying, “No democracy can exist unless each of its citizens is as capable of outrage at injustice to another as he is of outrage at injustice to himself.”

The sad part are the words, “No democracy can exist … “

We are RIGHT on schedule.

9.9.2021 – another story,

another story,
people, from another place
and another time

Based on a passage from My Life Through Food, (Gallery Books, New York, 2021).

The passage reads:

Losing a beloved family heirloom is a very real personal loss; they’re things that cannot ever be replaced or re-created.

But perhaps the most precious heirlooms are family recipes.

Like a physical heirloom, they remind us from whom and where we came and give others, in a bite, the story of another people from another place and another time.

Yet unlike a lost physical heirloom, recipes are a part of our history that can be re-created over and over again.

The only way they can be lost is if we choose to lose them.

For more on this book, please see the post 11.8.2021 – our history’s parts.

Please note, this post was NOT created on the date in the title.