3.21.2021 – a person, stable

a person, stable,
unimaginative, acts
in his or her life

Adapted from the book, The Architecture of Happiness (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

Consider the struts on the backs of two chairs.

Both seem to express a mood.

The curved struts speak of ease and playfulness, the straight ones of seriousness and logic.

And yet neither set approximates a human shape.

Rather, the struts abstractly represent two different temperaments.

A straight piece of wood behaves in its own medium as a stable, unimaginative person will act in his or her life, while the meanders of a curved piece correspond, however obliquely, with the casual elegance of an unruffled and dandyish soul.

According the The New York Review of Books, this is “A perceptive, thoughtful, original, and richly illustrated exercise in the dramatic personification of buildings of all sorts.”

What I find irrestible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, I would.

3.20.2021 – No Haiku for You?

No Haiku for You?
became no haiku for me
the day words stopped

Just over 2 years ago I started putting words and syllables together into what I generously titled, Haiku.

A little bit after that I started writing short essays on what brought those words and syllables together.

It all just happened.

I would see words, or read something or look at the floor or the sky and the haiku fell out of my brain.

About a month ago they stopped.

From what I read, I have hit a writers block.

So begins the introspection.

Why did they stop?

I have a new job that on the surface is the same job I used to have, working with online content, it has a big difference.

Today however I am called on supply a lot more the creative side of the content instead of just putting it online.

The old job had become kind of rote.

We put stories online.

After 20 years I could tell you what the stories would be before they were written.

I would joke with reporters, “Is it time for the bad cherry crop in Traverse City story already?” or “Time for the gold coin in the red bucket story.”

News Directors would say in meetings, “You know what made a good story this time of year in the past …”

And out would come the “No snowplows in Atlanta” story or the “Watch out for big waves on the Pier” story.

The cycle rarely changed and when it did we called it “Breaking News.”

Now I am not only responsible for getting the stories online, I am responsible for writing them, finding the photos, taking the photos, and getting them online.

Maybe my creative needs have found another outlet.

That is a possible reason.

Another is that recently I broke the 4th Wall and thought about my audience way too much.

I started to look at the keyboard and imagine someone reading what I wrote as I wrote it.

It was like I imagined myself in front of everyone.

Sure death for creativity.

As a side note, I remember how back at Crestview Elementary School we had to learn a song each spring and then have a parents event where all the classes sand their songs.

When I think my parents, with 11 kids, went through this yearly ritual from 1950 to 1980, I think of other forms of cruel and unusual punishment.

One year, I think in 3rd grade, I found out that if I rocked on my heels and locked at my toes, it wasn’t so bad to be up in front of all the parents.

Even though later in the evening one Dad said to me, “You’re the kid who never looked up,” I felt I had discovered a great work around to being up in front of people.

The next year, in 4th grade, during rehearsal in the school gym, I couldn’t wait to try it again,

All the classes were in the Gym for an assembly and took turns singing their class songs.

My class lined up on the steps to the stage in the Gym.

We started to sing.

I rocked back on my heels and looked at my toes.

This time I rocked back with a little too much enthusiasm and went right over on my back.

I was in the front row and like dominos or maybe bowling pins, I knocked down all the kids behind me.

With my ‘reputation’ the teachers and the Principal had no time for my explanation for my theory and I was banished to the hallway for the rest of the rehearsal with dire warnings of what would happen if I tried that during the performance.

This experience gave me great incite to the trials and tribulations of explorers and scientists in their efforts to garner support for new ideas.

I felt a kinship to Thomas Edison.

But I digress.

Some folks have noticed my lack of production and attributed it to the disappearance of Mr. Trump from the national stage.

I freely admit Mr. Trump’s antics were responsible for much creativity.

Maybe he just exhausted me and I need to recharge.

Maybe it I am experiencing a general exhaustion with Covid and elections and global climate change.

I also relocated from Atlanta to a small coastal town in South Caroline.

My wife has noticed the slow life of the low country.

Maybe its just the lack of stimulation.

Or maybe it is too much stimulation.

I also have been working from home and not driving to work.

Much of my thinking and mental puttering around was in the car during my endless commutes in Atlanta.

That I was off in Haiku land and not paying attention to the drive should come as a surprise to no one.

But I starting working from home a year ago due to covid and that didn’t stop my outputbut then I did have the election and the orange guy for inspiration.

Maybe it is because I started reading Fran Leibowitz’s writing and watching her show, “Pretend its a city.”

She famously has suffered from writers block for decades.

Ms. Leibowitz writes that her editor says, “that the paralysis I have about writing is caused by an excessive reverence for the written word, and I think that’s probably true.”

In searching for use in my Haiku the outstanding in the use of language, maybe I too, came to a paralysis about writing, caused by an excessive reverence for the written word.

Yeah, sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Maybe I live too close to the beach.

Maybe I just wore out.

Maybe, maybe, maybe.

As I love to quote Frank Lloyd Wright, “Well, there it is.”

I will continue to read.

I will continue to think.

I will continue to ponder.

And when I feel it, I will contine to write.

Until then, No Haiku … for me.

3.14.2021 – we are witness to

we are witness to
a playful relationship,
rendered majestic

Adapted from the book, The Architecture of Happiness (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

A bright morning in the Tate Gallery, St Ives, Cornwall. On a plinth sits a marble sculpture by Barbara Hepworth, first exhibited in 1936. Although it is unclear what exactly these three stones might mean or represent – a mystery reflected in their reticent title, Two Segments and a Sphere – they nevertheless manage to arrest and reward our gaze. Their interest centres on the opposition between the ball and the semicircular wedge on which it rests. The ball looks unstable and energetic; we sense how keenly it wants to roll down the segment’s leading edge and bowl across the room. By contrast with this impulsiveness, the accompanying wedge conveys maturity and stability: it seems content to nurse gently from side to side, taming the recklessness of its charge. In viewing the piece, we are witness to a tender and playful relationship, rendered majestic through the primordial medium of polished white marble.

According the The New York Review of Books, this is “A perceptive, thoughtful, original, and richly illustrated exercise in the dramatic personification of buildings of all sorts.”

What I find irrestible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, I would.

3.13.2021 – in game of inches –

in game of inches –
somethings wrong? Change the inches!
But square sinks won’t drain!

From what I read, some folks are wondering what is wrong with the game of baseball.

What they mean is something is wrong with Major League Baseball and that it doesn’t seem to have the same attraction as it did, the same strangle hold on the national imagination that it did.

What could be wrong with a GAME that is played by multi-millionaire’s ‘playing’ for teams controlled by billionaires funded by an entertainment industry that creates kazillionaires and how could it have lost touch with the little people?

The game itself, as some like to say, is a game of inches.

The bang-bang play at first.

The deep fly ball that becomes a foul ball by less than the width of the ball.

And something is wrong here.

I read where one of the suggested solutions is that there are not enough inches.

I read where it has been suggested that bases, the physical bases, be increased on size by 3 inches.

This will be tried out this year in the minors.

Boy, Howdy!

Smack my head and call me stupid.

Of course!

It is the size of the bases!

I remember reading a long long time ago when the American Basketball Association merged with the National Basketball Association.

One of the major benefits of this was that one Julius Winfield Erving II would now be playing for the Philadelphia 76ers.

That meant that Dr. J would be coming to the Detroit Pistons.

The article I was reading started with the story of a fan in Detorit who read the news, drove to the Pistons Ticket Office, put out his money and said, “Give me two for everything you got with the Doctor!”

I can just imagine reading about all the one time Baseball fans running to the ball park ticket window and asking for more tickets NOW THAT THEY FIXED THE SIZE OF THE BASES.

OH PLEASE.

REALLY!

Can some one, any adult, anyone, any math teacher, any physics teacher, any teacher, ANYONE please tell these geniuses that expanding the base by three inches will only move the bang-bang play three inches further out?

How does this change the game?

How does this improve the game?

In the novel, Shoeless Joe, JD Salinger remarks that, ” … the one constant through all the years had been baseball. America has been erased like a blackboard, only to be rebuilt and erased again. But baseball has marked time while America has rolled by like a procession of steamrollers. It is the same game that Moonlight Graham played in 1905. It is a living part of history.”

In the movie, “Field of Dreams”, this speech is delivered by James Earl Jones (’55-UofM) in the roll of a fictional Terry Mann who wrote a book titled the “Boat Rocker.”

I am not sure why JD Salinger and “Catcher in the Rye” (which plays an integral part of the novel – Ray’s Dad is a Catcher … ) but there it is.

So something is wrong with Baseball.

It must be the game.

Who thinks these things up?

Who thinks these things?

This morning I spent 5 minutes trying to wipe out the kitchen sink.

The sink is a deep, flat cornered, rectangle.

The corners are sqaure.

The silly thing won’t drain.

You wipe one corner of crumbs and they flow to the next corner.

You chase them around and wipe and wipe and wipe.

Then you spray.

No matter what you do, a square sink won’t drain.

SO who came up with this design?

Who thinks these things up?

Who thinks these type of things?

Sinks were rounded and dish shaped, sloping towards the drain for a billion years for one reason.

THEY WORKED.

They really could not be improved on.

SO WHY?

Who makes these decisions?

Some years ago I was told by a plumber that a plumber needed to know just three things.

One, pay day is friday.

Two, don’t chew your nails.

Three, water flows downhill.

Sometimes I tremble for humanity.

I used to have a baseball bat in my office.

I had written on it with a magic marker, COMPUTER REPAIR KIT.

One of the tech guys was in my office and laughed at it, then said, very quietly, “You know, Microsoft does NOT make things to NOT WORK.”

And he stared at me for a bit.

I think about that a lot.

And I think about how true it is.

Of course Microsoft does not makes things to NOT WORK.

So it the computer is not working …

Not wanting to point fingers but then maybe what was wrong was something … I did?

Boy, Howdy!

I am going to the beach.

3.12.2021 – experience this

experience this
awkward unanswerable
be modern question

Adapted from the book, The Architecture of Happiness (2009, Vintage Books) by Alain de Botton, and the passage:

What is a beautiful building? To be modern is to experience this as an awkward and possibly unanswerable question, the very notion of beauty having come to seem like a concept doomed to ignite unfruitful and childish argument. How can anyone claim to know what is attractive? How can anyone adjudicate between the competing claims of different styles or defend a particular choice in the face of the contradictory tastes of others? The creation of beauty, once viewed as the central task of the architect, has quietly evaporated from serious professional discussion and retreated to a confused private imperative.

According the The New York Review of Books, this is “A perceptive, thoughtful, original, and richly illustrated exercise in the dramatic personification of buildings of all sorts.”

What I find irrestible in reading Mr. de Botton is his use of language.

I get the feeling that if you made a spread sheet of all the words, adverbs and adjectives used by Mr. de Botton, you just might find that he used each word just once.

Neat trick in writing a book.

If I knew how to do that, I would.