round and round it goes
where traffic stops nobody knows –
changes, not progress
I was reading this morning about the feral hog/pig/boar problem in Florida.
I fell in love with a sentence that read, “The hog issue is not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be attenuated.”
I read it over.
I read it outloud.
The hog issue is not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be attenuated.
I wanted to grab and pad and pencil and start making a list of problems, that cannot be thought of as a solvable problems, but ones that could only be attenuated.
I quickly realized that my pad would not be big enough.
What a simple solution to so many issues.
In my mind somewhere is the saying, “If there is no solution, it is not a problem.”
This is a great saying to have handy when there is beach nearby that you can visit easily.
Some problem or issue pops up in your email.
You have no answer.
You have no solution.
No solution, then there is no problem.
No problem, well then, no problem and I am off to the beach.
But if the issue is not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be attenuated, then goodbye going to the beach and get to work.
Get to work on attenuating the problem.
What a great word.
My pirated desktop Oxford English Dictionary defines attenuated as weakened in intensity, force, effect, value.
I now want to grab my pad and pencil and list all the things in my life that have been weakened in intensity, force, effect, value as I get older.
But I quickly realize I don’t have enough time.
So back to the problems that are not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be attenuated.
Can there be anything higher on the list than traffic?
Put today’s rubrics together and we can create a statement that might read: “Traffic is not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be weakened in intensity, force, effect and value.”
I really like that.
Traffic is not thought of as a solvable problem, but one that could only be weakened in intensity, force, effect and value.
It was Bill Bryson who wrote that traffic engineers cannot fix traffic, but they can spread the problem out over a larger area.
The latest fashion of dealing with traffic here in the south is the traffic circle.
On a drive from my home to the beach I will navigate three of these answers to traffic problems.
According to the Wikipedia, “Compared to stop signs, traffic signals, and earlier forms of roundabouts, modern roundabouts reduce the likelihood and severity of collisions greatly by reducing traffic speeds and minimizing T-bone and head-on collisions.”
So they reduce the likelihood of accidents.
Or do they reduce the likelihood of the T-Bone and head on collisions while increasing the likely hood of side swipes and rear-corner panel collisions.
But do they improve traffic flow?
Wouldn’t that be the main question?
Wouldn’t that be the goal of someone who is trying to weaken in intensity, force, or effect the ‘not thought of as a solvable problem’ traffic?
The other fun part of these traffic circles for me is two of the three circles are on Hilton Head Island here in South Carolina.
The island, like Mackinac Island, has lots of bikes.
Lot and lots of bikes.
The island, unlike Mackinac Island, has lots of cars.
Lots and lots of cars.
Neither of these issues are thought of as a solvable problems for the island.
Neither of these issues seems to have been thought out as forms of transportation that can co-exist on the same overloaded roadways.
Then I ran across this.
An elevated bike traffic circle the floats over the roadway
The hovenring was built in the Netherlands.
The hovenring is perfect for Hilton Head Island.
According to wikipedia, The hovernring was built because, “In order to improve the flow of traffic and improve safety, it was decided to completely separate motorized and bicycle traffic.“
So much for the thinking that this might be not be thought of as solvable problem.
Here is evidence of real change for the better!
Here is evidence of real progress towards a real solution.
Of course, there is some more to the wikipedia entry.
It goes on to say, “In addition, it was decided to transform the roundabout for cars into a regular crossing of streets, to improve the flow of traffic“
So it goes.
Round and round.
And as we all know, what goes around, comes around.
It’s not thought of as a solvable problem.