12.8.2024 – insufficient to

insufficient to
make a recognisable
explosion, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

From the article, The most dangerous delivery truck? How a lorry-load of antimatter will help solve secrets of universe written by Robin McKie, science editor of The Observer.

McKie writes:

Antimatter is the most expensive material on Earth – it’s estimated it would cost several trillion dollars to make a gram – and it can only be manufactured in particle physics laboratories such as the Cern research centre near Geneva.

It is also extremely tricky to handle. If antimatter makes contact with normal matter, both are annihilated, releasing a powerful burst of electromagnetic radiation. Only by carefully combining sets of powerful electrical and magnetic fields in special devices can antimatter be stored safely.

“That makes moving it around very difficult, though we are now close to making our first journey,” said Prof Stefan Ulmer, a scientist at Cern. “Antimatter has so much to tell us. That is why we are doing this.”

The prospect of a similar blast happening in real life is remote, scientists insist – the quantities of antimatter carried will be insufficient to make an explosion of any recognisable nature.

Three things here to point out besides that last paragraph being a wonderful assemblage of words.

One, I did not know that in Europe recognisable is spelled with a S and not a Z so here in the states recognisable is tossed by spell check.

Two, the work in question is being done at European Organization for Nuclear Research which is known as CERN. I have never understood that. (along with the world soccer organization being known as FIFA).

Three, I would like a little more information on just what makes, “an explosion of any recognisable nature.

When Enrico Fermi and the Manhattan Project folks set up the first self sustaining Atomic Reactor Pile, they were 99% sure it wouldn’t blow up and destroy all life within 100’s of miles if not the earth itself in an uncontrollable chain reaction gone uncontrollable.

They chose downtown Chicago for the test site.

Not until the Plutarkians came to strip mine Chicago in the 1990s did the city face such a possibility but the Plutarkians were defeated by the Biker Mice from Mars that lived in the scoreboard at Wrigley Field.

Still I feel my question is valid.

When dealing with antimatter … how big, how bad is an explosion of any recognisable nature?

Back in the day when I was in college there was an out break of measles and students who had never been vaccinated were advised to get a shot.

I thought about it and thought about it and thought, I had never been vacinated.

I called my Mom and she thought about it and thought about it and decided that in our family of 11 kids we had been exposed to measles but the last time someone had it, my brother Pete, she brought us all down to the Doctors who gave us Gamma Globulin short term protection shots and was told to get us all in for a vacine in about 6 months.

But with 11 kids, one thing happens after another and we never got back for our vaccine so Mom advised me to get the shot.

In line at the Student Health Clinic I was given a waver to sign

It said something along the lines of 1 out of 100,000 people MIGHT develop symptoms or have a reaction or get hit with Encephalitis.

In parenthesis the disclaimer read (A swelling of the brain).

Standing in line, I raised my head and yelled out, ‘Can I get anymore information about this SWELLING OF THE BRAIN?’

Everyone in lined ducked their heads down to look at the disclaimer.

The nurses all glared at me.

But I had an audience.

I then read off ALL the bad things that could happen and asked for more information as the line slowly move forward.

When I got to the nurse she leaned in and said to I wasn’t being very helpful as many of the people in line had a lot of anxiety about getting a shot, would I please SHUT UP.

I stood there.

Then I asked the nurse in a loud voice, “DID YOU EVER TALK TO ANYONE WHO DIED FROM A MEASLES SHOT?”

The nurse said LOUDLY, “OF COURSE NOT!”

And I said, “BECAUSE THEY WERE DEAD!”

And that nurse took that needle and jammed it straight into my arm.

She looked at me and grinned.

“You flinched,” she said.

All I want is a little more information on these explosions of an unrecognizable nature.

12.4.2024 – should I weep for this

should I weep for this
gull meets with his image on
the winter water

All day I have thought of her
There is nothing left of that year

(There is sere-grass
Salt colored)

We have annulled it with
Salt

We have galled it clean to the clay with that one autumn
The hedge-rows keep the rubbish and the leaves

There is nothing left of that year in our lives but the leaves of it
As though it had not been at all

As though the love the love and the life altered
Even ourselves are as strangers in these thoughts

Why should I weep for this?

What have I brought her?
Of sorrow of sorrow of sorrow her heart full

The gull
Meets with his image on the winter water.

Autumn as published in The Collected poems by Archibald MacLeish, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1917.

Still sunny.

Bright sunshine.

Still wet.

Splashing waves.

Still sandy.

Lots and lots of sand at the beach.

But cold.

But …

But the promise of summer, summer sunshine.

The gull meets his image on the winter water.

I can’t, I won’t weep for this.

12.3.2024 – not a clever guy …

not a clever guy …
they do my thinking – should have …
hired a conscience, too

… I’m not a clever guy. I never pretended I was long on brains. I have a publicity man and a gag man and a few writers. People like Hagenborn and Peck. They do my thinking for me.” [ said Tony ]

“You should have hired a conscience, too.” [ said Bill ]

From H as in Hunted by Lawrence Treat (Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York, 1946).

When Lawrence Arthur Goldstone’s law firm broke up in 1928, shortly after he had begun to work there, he traveled to Paris. A friend living in Brittany provided him with free room and board, and Goldstone decided to settle down and teach himself to write. His knowledge of law led him to try his hand at crime writing. He sold his very first novel and returned to the United States to write full-time under the name Lawrence Treat according to Wikipedia.

Recently in article in the New York Times about old books worth reading, H is for Hunted was listed so I got a copy and am enjoying it.

I really want to stay off of politics but when our hero, Bill, tracks down Tony to ask about what happened when they were together during the war and why Tony let it sit for 3 years, Tony says that line above which I’ll quote again:

… I’m not a clever guy. I never pretended I was long on brains. I have a publicity man and a gag man and a few writers. People like Hagenborn and Peck. They do my thinking for me.

They do my thinking for me.

Sure reminds me of the bunch of folks lining up to take jobs where there will be running the Executive Branch of our government.

They aren’t clever (well, maybe they are.)

They hire publicity men, gag men, a few writers.

They do their thinking for them.

To paraphrase what Bill said, I wish they had hired a conscience, too!

Still working on the use of the ellipsis in haiku.

But it’s my blog, my rules.

So there you are.

11.30.2024 – happiness – sadness

happiness – sadness
feel tragic optimism
even in the same hour

Tragic optimism means acknowledging, accepting and even expecting that life will contain hardship and hurt, then doing everything we can to move forward with a positive attitude anyway.

It recognizes that one cannot be happy by trying to be happy all the time, or worse yet, assuming we ought to be.

Rather, tragic optimism holds space for the full range of human experience and emotion, giving us permission to feel happiness and sadness, hope and fear, loss and possibility — sometimes in the same day, and even in the same hour.

From the New York Times Opinion piece, How to Keep Going Amid the Chaos by Brad Stulberg.

According to his NYT Times bio, Mr. Stulberg is the author of “Master of Change: How to Excel When Everything Is Changing, Including You; Embracing Life’s Instability with Rugged Flexibility―a Practical Model for Resilience.” He writes about mental health and excellence.

Mr. Stulberg closes with:

At a moment when it can seem that all is lost, we’d be wise to embrace tragic optimism, wise hope and wise action.

In this we recognize we can exert our agency, even if limitedly, even if only in increments, however we can.

These attitudes and skills, and our willingness to adopt and practice them, are essential to not only our individual resilience but that of our communities.

We need both now.

Is Mr. Stulberg writing about America right now?

Is Mr. Stulberg writing about University of Michigan football?

Is Mr. Stulberg writing about … both?

11.29.2024 – seeking to advance

seeking to advance
a revolutionary
transvaluation

In his opinion essay, “The Moral Challenge of Trumpism,” David Brooks quotes a Mr. Damon Linker who writes:

“Trumpism is seeking to advance a revolutionary transvaluation of values by inverting the morality that undergirds both traditional conservatism and liberal institutionalism. In this inversion, norms and rules that counsel and enforce propriety, restraint and deference to institutional authority become vices, while flouting them become virtues.”

For me, this simple but wonderful use of words hits at what I feel about the incoming administration.

Mr. Brooks expands on the idea of “norms and rules that counsel and enforce propriety, restraint and deference to institutional authority become vices, while flouting them become virtues.” writing:

What does heroism look like according the MAGA morality? It looks like the sort of people whom Trump has picked to be in his cabinet. The virtuous man in this morality is self-assertive, combative, transgressive and vengeful. He’s not afraid to break the rules and come to his own conclusions. He has contempt for institutions and is happy to be a battering force to bring them down. He is unbothered by elite scorn but, in fact, revels in it and goes out of his way to generate it.

In this mind-set, if the establishment regards you as a sleazeball, you must be doing something right. If the legal system indicts you, you must be a virtuous man.

In this morality, the fact that a presidential nominee is accused of sexual assault is a feature, not a bug. It’s a sign that this nominee is a manly man. Manly men go after what they want. They assert themselves and smash propriety — including grabbing women “by the pussy” if they feel like it.

In this worldview, a nominee enshrouded in scandal is more trustworthy than a person who has lived an honest life. The scandal-shrouded nominee is cast out from polite society. He’s not going to run to a New York publisher and write a tell-all memoir bashing the administration in which he served. Such a person is not going to care if he is scorned by the civil servants in the agency he has been hired to dismantle.

Now comes my point.

I know so many folks who say something along the line of “… I voted for Trump, but I don’t go along with all these things he says or does.”

See there is this train.

I don’t like the train.

I don’t like where the train is going.

I don’t like the accommodations on the train.

I don’t like the schedule the train runs on.

I don’t even like the color of the train or the arrangement of the seating or how I get my tickets on the train.

BUT they serve a really good lunch on the train on Tuesdays so I buy and ticket to ride the train.

I might get my lunch, but I get everything else, including ending up where that train is headed when I bought my ticket and provided the means for the train to operate.

As Mr. Brooks writes, “… character is destiny.”