4.30.2025 – parents had hard time

parents had hard time
convincing me he was no
kin whatsoever

I can remember that on the shelves at home there were these books by Thomas Wolfe.

Look Homeward Angel and Of Time and the River. Of Time and the River had just come out when I was aware of his name.

My parents had a hard time convincing me that he was no kin whatsoever.

My attitude was, Well, what’s he doing on the shelf then?

But as soon as I was old enough I became a tremendous fan of Thomas Wolfe and remain so to this day.

I ignore his fluctuations on the literary stock market.

From Tom Wolfe, The Art of Fiction No. 123 as Interviewed by George Plimpton, The Paris Review, Issue 118, Spring 1991.

Myself, I long confused Thomas Wolfe and Tom Wolfe.

I always thought is was the guy who wrote The Right Stuff who said you can’t go home again.

And I am not sure when it was that I got straightened out.

Even when I started working in a bookstore I wasn’t completely sure until I shelved The Right Stuff in New Releases and Look Homeward Angel in classics.

Then I got Thomas Wolfe mixed up with Thomas Mann and I seem to be forever paying for not taking a 100 best books class in college.

I always enjoyed Tom Wolfe’s writing.

I was always a bit amazed listening to his interviews and wondering how he survived long enough to write.

4.25.2025 – die with empty hands

die with empty hands
and empty pockets, but with
a very full heart

40 years ago, when I went through orientation as a new student in college, my advisor asked me what classes I planned to take outside of my major, US History.

I told him I hadn’t thought much about what else to take and that I didn’t really care.

He stared at me for a second and then kind of exploded, YOU ARE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN – YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO STUDY WITH ANY NUMBER OF GREAT SCHOLARS AND WORLD TOPICS … DON’T YOU DARE NOT CARE.

We sat for a minute in silence.

Me, I was scared to death.

He was most likely bored but he kept looking me in the eye.

He tried again and asked what I liked and somehow we got on the subject of art and I ended up with a minor in History of Art of the Renaissance.

And I have never regretted it.

The Professors and the lectures and even my co students in this field were all wonderful and they really loved what they were studying.

The lectures on the high Renaissance, when I would put away my pencil and just listen, were love stories.

One professor spent a few weeks on the life and work of one Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio and the passion of the artist came through in the passion of the professor.

So it was with both some joy and some understanding that I came across the article, Piercing the Shadows of the Pope’s Favorite Painting by Jason Farago (April 24, 2025 – NYT).

Mr. Farago touched on the passion of the art of writing: In some of the grandest churches, Caravaggio endeavored to bring the saints and the angels down from the heavens to earth. But the naturalism had a function that went beyond popular accessibility. Because what matters, what makes Caravaggio so much more than an illustrator, is less the realism of the sacred image than its translation — through the bodies and faces of ordinary people — from the time of the Gospels to now. Into Caravaggio’s time. Into ours.

You could not study the art of Caravaggio with people who understood it and not have it all sink into your core.

Because, some how, it all mattered.

Mr. Farago then writes, quoting Pope Francis:

“Among the great painters, I admire Caravaggio; his paintings speak to me,” Francis said shortly after his election as pope.

During his trips to Rome when he was still the archbishop of Buenos Aires, Francis favored lodgings right near San Luigi dei Francesi. “Every time I came to Rome,” he later said during an address at St. Peter’s, he would seek out one painting in particular. It was the “Calling of St. Matthew,” in the church’s Contarelli Chapel.

“It is the gesture of Matthew that strikes me,” Francis said shortly after his elevation to the papacy. The instinctive lunge for the coins was one he saw in himself. “He holds on to his money as if to say, ‘No, not me! No, this money is mine.’”

You are comfortable, you’re not looking for it, but the calling comes just the same. “Here, this is me, a sinner on whom the Lord has turned his gaze,” the pope continued. “And this is what I said when they asked me if I would accept my election as pontiff.”

Lets say that again.

“It is the gesture of Matthew that strikes me,” Francis said shortly after his elevation to the papacy.

The instinctive lunge for the coins was one he saw in himself.

He holds on to his money as if to say, ‘No, not me! No, this money is mine.’

You are comfortable.

You’re not looking for it.

But the calling comes just the same.

I found this comment on another website and it fits in nicely.

Pope Francis on Matthew’s conversion story: “That day, when Matthew left his home, said goodbye to his wife, he never thought he was going to come back without money, and concerned about how to have such a big feast to prepare … for him who had loved him first, who had surprised Matthew with something very special, more important than all the money that he had.”

As God surprised Matthew, so would God’s surprises “shake the ground from under your feet and make you unsure. But they move us forward in the right direction. Real love leads you to spend yourself … even at the risk of having your hands empty.

He referred to St. Francis, his namesake, who “died with empty hands, empty pockets, but with a very full heart … Think well, feel well, do well. Be wise, allow yourselves to be surprised by the love of God.”

Die with empty hands.

Die with empty pockets, but die with with a very full heart …

Think well.

Feel well.

Do well.

Be wise.

Allow yourselves to be surprised by the love of God.

4.23.2025 – here I sit with my …

here I sit with my …
shoes mismated – lawdy mercy
I is frustrated

Bad Morning by Langston Hughes

Here I sit
With my shoes mismated.
Lawdy-mercy!
I’s frustrated!

As printed in The collected poems of Langston Hughes by Langston Hughes, New York, Knopf, 1994.

Three days a week, I have to get up and drive into the office.

I may live in podunk but it’s an island podunk and there is only one way in and one way off and while there isn’t the volume of traffic that there is in Atlanta, for example, the drive is, in its own way, more exasperating than an Atlanta commute.

So I do the what I did when I lived in ATL.

I get up early to try and beat the traffic.

I get up early before the sun is up.

So I don’t bother the wife, I will get my clothes together the night before and set them out in the living room.

Before I go to bed I’ll check to make sure I got underwear, socks, pants, shirt, belt and shoes.

But there are those mornings where I forget something.

More often than not, it is socks.

So I stealthily sneak (always wanted to write that phrase) back into the bedroom and feel my way over to the dresser and open my sock drawer.

A sock drawer filled with … dark socks.

In the dark, in a dark room, fumbling in a dark drawer for dark socks.

Often I end up with socks that mismatch.

Maybe not as bad as shoes, and looking at my kids, I wonder if it matters.

But for me it is going into my day with one boot off.

Socks mismatched.

Shoes mismatched.

Lawdy MERCY!

I is frustrated.


4.2.2025 – no sympathy

no sympathy
historically bad
favourability

In her Guardian Opinion piece, Is Usha Vance starting to feel a little sorry for herself?, Arwa Mahdawi writes:

They won all right, but pretty much everyone in the US now thinks JD is a loser. He has historically bad favourability ratings and there are memes of him everywhere. I have absolutely no sympathy for Usha – who is far from a victim – but I have to wonder if she is starting to feel a little sorry for herself.

I just love the way historically bad favourability just rolls off the tongue.

I mean who can live with that?

Maybe the Vance’s see that as the challange.

Back in the day when I taught 4th grade Sunday School (think that one through why don’t you) I had a kid was so ‘just not going to take part and I don’t care’ that I told I was going to flunk him.

He was going to flunk 4th grade Sunday School.

You can’t, he said,

I can, I said.

You won’t, he said.

I will , I said.

As a matter of fact, I said, you will be the first kid in history to FLUNK 4th GRADE SUNDAY SCHOOL!

He looked at me for a second.

The gets this look in his eye.

“I’ll be … the first?”, he said.

And breaks into the biggest gleam.

3.31.2025 – top security aides

top security aides
amateurs they are – new week
new dimwit roundup …

I really really want to get away from comments about the current administration – both from a desire to look away and from a growing feeling of need to be self-preservational, nevertheless, some of the best word play in today’s media concerns the new administration and I started this blog to recognized unique use of words … so there you are.

In todays Conversation, a back-and-forth commentary on the past week between Gail Collins and Bret Stephens in the New York Times, they write:

Bret: If President Trump were, well, someone else entirely, he’d be the one buying Jeff a drink for keeping the nation’s military secrets to himself for as long as they needed keeping — and then exposing Trump’s top national security aides as the amateurs they are.

Gail: A new week, a new dimwit roundup …

Mr. Stephens is a conservative, it should be noted.

Sorry to say we are talking about the security team that manages the safety of the United States and not, shall we say, the Chicago Cubs of yor, the lovable losers of 108 seasons between the World Series victories of 1908 and 2016.

Baseball teams that raised losing and snatching defeat from the jaws of victory to an art form.

A new week, a new dimwit roundup …

It would be funny.

It would be comical.

If it wasn’t true.