2.4.2024 – reading with Tony

reading with Tony
shared book old friends together
like he is right here

We married sisters.

I can say that about a lot of guys.

My wife had 8 sisters.

Though they are the husbands of my wife’s sisters, I think I am correct in saying they are my brothers-in-law.

The Oxford English Dictionary says of using ‘in-law’ that it is Sometimes extended to the husband of one’s wife’s (or husband’s) sister.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company, updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company states:

broth·er-in-law (brr-n-lô) n. pl. broth·ers-in-law (brrz-)

  1. The brother of one’s spouse.
  2. The husband of one’s sister.
  3. The husband of the sister of one’s spouse

I guess that is good enough for me and I am digressing from my story.

Last summer my wife returned from a visit up north and brought me back a book as a gift from one of her sisters.

The book had belonged to my brother-in-law Tony and my sister-in-law thought I would like to read it.

Tony and I shared a relationship of scholarly interest in the history of the United States in general and the American political scene back to the 1930s.

We had taken a lot of the same type of classes in college and read a lot of the same books.

For us, nothing was more fun then to find a quiet corner of a family gettogether and converse over the past mistakes of Harry Truman and the triumphs of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

I remember one 4th of July when someone came by and asked if we had settled World War 2 yet and Tony replied, “No, but we just finished up the Neutrality Acts of 1939.”

Tony died back in 2019 and I miss him and his conversation.

We had not had much opportunity to talk since moving south but Tony and I had a history, one of those friendships that Julian Fellows describes in his fun book, Snobs (Downton Abby in the 20th century), when Mr. Fellows writes:

“nothing is more agreeable than the renewal of such a friendship after several years’ interlude, as there is no need for the preamble to intimacy. It is already in place. One may immediately pick it up, like a piece of unfinished tapestry, where one left off ten years before.”

With this in mind, I appreciated the gift very much.

I started reading, it was a book on FDR, and about 100 or so pages into the book, I came to passage that made me say, boy this is stupid.

I sat back in my rocker and with the book open on my lap and said out loud to no one, “Wonder what Tony would say to that?”

I returned to my reading and turned the page to finish the passage.

On the next page, Tony had taken a pencil, underlined the last line of the passage and wrote, “Nope!

It was a nice little gift.

A few words, a pencil line, and he is right here.

I think we were discussing Woodrow Wilson and his 14 Points at Versailles – Tony looks to have carried his point though I felt his views on Wilson had a suspect animus …

Leave a comment