wealth and privilege
bias of money
In the movie Citizen Kane, Charles Foster Kane, played by Orson Welles, explains why he is attacking the money and the trusts that are trying to run the city.
Kane says, “I am the publisher of the Enquirer. As such, it is my duty – I’ll let you in on a little secret, it is also my pleasure – to see to it that decent, hard-working people of this city are not robbed blind by a group of money – mad pirates because, God help them, they have no one to look after their interests! I’ll let you in on another little secret, Mr. Thatcher. I think I’m the man to do it. You see, I have money and property –
If I don’t defend the interests of the underprivileged, somebody else will – maybe somebody without any money or any property and that would be too bad.”
Is this what motivates the billionaire of today to enter politics?
They have money and property and if they don’t defend ‘the working man’ someone else will.
A someone without any money and property.
And that would be too bad.
Too bad for who?
The people with money and property?
I cannot figure where, why or what is motivating these billionaires.
Barbara Holland wrote of the Roosevelt’s, that their money was so old, it didn’t crackle anymore, it whispered.
Mr. FD Roosvelt (to keep him straight from his cousin and wife’s uncle, TR Roosevelt) was born rich.
Mr. Roosevelt had it all.
Money, privilege and position.
And then he got polio.
Then he ran for Governor of New York and President of the United States.
Ran in the political sense of word as after the polio, he had to use a wheelchair.
Eleanor Roosevelt was once asked if the polio had affected FDR’s mind at all.
Anyone who has gone through great suffering,” Eleanor explained, “is bound to have a greater sympathy and understanding of the problems of mankind.”
Somewhere I read a version of this quote that Eleanor said polio had affected his mind.
It taught him to understand the hopeless.
In his 2nd Inaugural address, FDR said, “I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished. … The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”
Worth repeating, The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
A third time, it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
I want Roosevelt again.
POSTSCRIPT: A story was told back in the day that after FDR died in 1945, a Republican was laughing at a Democrat, saying “who are you gonna get to run now?” The Democrat shook his head and said, “Don’t know, we will dig someone up.” “NO NO NO PLEASE,” said the Republican.
ONE last thing, many Political Scientists and Historians don’t think that Mr. Truman was elected in 1948 but that FDR was reelected for a 5th term.