2.22.2023 – citizens by birth or

citizens by birth or
choice, of a common country
name belongs to you

Citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections.

The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.

With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles.

You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together.

The independence and liberty you possess are the work of joint councils and joint efforts – of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.

From the Farewell Address of George Washington.

The preface of a memorial edition printed by the Senate of the United States in the year 2000, states:

In September 1796, worn out by burdens of the presidency and attacks of political foes, George Washington announced his decision not to seek a third term.

With the assistance of Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, Washington composed in a “Farewell Address” his political testament to the nation.

Designed to inspire and guide future generations, the address also set forth Washington’s defense of his administration’s record and embodied a classic statement of Federalist doctrine.

Designed to inspire and guide.

I am not sure who came up with the wording for With slight shades of difference as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison helped out, but I have to marvel.

With slight shades of difference.

Citizen’s by birth OR choice.

The name that BELONGS to you.

The name of American.

The name that BELONGS to you.

Citizen’s by birth OR choice.

With slight shades of difference.

Words you could spray paint on a wall somewhere …

Appropriate reading for the General’s Birthday, 2023.

2.18.2023 – was preventable

was preventable
but in some ways was also
inevitable

The story I read, Down to Earth: The Arizona teen whose death in extreme heat is a warning of tragic things to come, by Nina Lakhani in the Guardian, is an article about the heat in Phoenix and the death in 2022 of a young man named Caleb Blair.

Caleb Blair, Ms. Lakhani writes, was a sweet talented kid with mental health struggles ended up naked and handcuffed, high and overheated, on the forecourt of a Circle K gas station.

It is an article filled with awfulness on many many levels.

Ms. Lakhani writes: His tragic death was preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable given the US’s social, health and economic inequalities. And it signals that the climate crisis is a risk multiplier – it exposes, intersects with and amplifies existing problems such as housing shortages, inadequate mental health and addiction services, racist policing, and the lack of shade in cities, to name just a few.

His tragic death was preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable given the US’s social, health and economic inequalities.

A terrible statement to read or say out loud.

A statement made more terrible maybe as that it mentions the US’s social, health and economic inequalities.

Social, health and economic inequalities in the United States.

The greatest country on the face of the earth.

One month after Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt gave a speech that explained why America was in World War 2.

America was fighting for Democracy which, according to FDR, included economic opportunity, employment, social security, and the promise of “adequate health care”.

America, FDR said, was fighting for the four freedoms.

And just the four freedoms for the America but for the whole world.

The Four Freedoms?

 Freedom of speech.

Freedom of worship.

Freedom from want.

Freedom from fear.

Joe Stalin saw the flaw here right away.

When Stalin met FDR and the Four Freedoms came up, Stalin asked if Want meant Desire.

FDR was quit to point out that he meant, WANTS or NEEDS not desires.

As an aside though, FDR was once asked what book he would have people in the Soviet Union read to help understand the differences between the USSR and the USA. The Sears Roebuck Catalog, said FDR.

Freedom from want.

Social, health and economic inequalities in the United States.

Preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable.

Maybe as George Bailey said, “… is it too much to have them work and pay and live and die in a couple of decent rooms and a bath?

Preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable.

Maybe I need to include the first part of that line of George Bailey’s from It’s a Wonderful Life.

The line starts, they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this town.

The living and dying in this town.

Social, health and economic inequalities in the United States.

Preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable.

Boy Howdy, but if that isn’t the caption on the feelings of just about everything today.

Preventable, but in some ways it was also inevitable.

What happened to the promise?

2.12.2023 – would not be a slave

would not be a slave,
not be master, my idea
of democracy

Abraham Lincoln is one of those people whose every written word and every public utterance has become almost sacred.

His Presidential papers were donated, by his son Robert, to the Library of Congress.

In the description to the collection at the Library of Congress, we read:

The papers of Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865), lawyer, representative from Illinois, and sixteenth president of the United States, contain approximately 40,550 documents dating from 1774 to 1948, although most of the collection spans from the 1850s through Lincoln’s presidency (1861-1865).

Among those 40,550 documents is a scrap of paper with some words in the handwriting style of Mr. Lincoln.

It says:

As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.

This expresses my idea of democracy.

Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is not democracy.

As one writer says of this scrap of paper, The provenance of the tantalizing document is questionable, as is the date, although the editors of his collected work conjectured that he wrote it on August 1, 1858.

The provenance of the tantalizing document is questionable yet the words on the scrap of paper were included by Aaron Copeland in his Lincoln Portrait.

If you search Aaron Copland and Lincoln Portrait on You Tube you can here the words of Mr. Lincoln read by:

William Warfield

James Earl Jones

Phylicia Rashad 

and even

Aaron Copeland himself.

Anyone of you should give yourself a present on this 214 anniversary of Mr. Lincoln’s Birthday and listen to any of these version on this February twelfth.

My favorite is the one I embedded in this post with narration by Henry Fonda.

It is my favorite for two reasons.

One, with Mr. Fonda playing Young Abe Lincoln and with the midwestern twang, I feel this is kinda close to what you would have got with Mr. Lincoln.

The second is that it is the first version I ever heard when I heard it on a record I checked out of the Grand Rapids Public Library.

The list of recorded narrators is really quite impressive as it allows anyone who can read a chance to record with a symphony orchestra.

The list includes, Barack Obama, Margaret Thatcher and Willie Stargell.

Still, the narrators read the words written by Mr. Lincoln.

It is good to note that while the settings and music provided this piece were in no way imaginable by Mr. Lincoln, it all seems altogether fitting and proper that they appear together.

Mr. Copeland himself liked to tell the story that a performance of the Lincoln Portrait in Venezuela was credited with sparking the popular uprising that led to his removal from power.

Mr. Copeland related that “On that evening Juana Sujo was the fiery narrator who performed the spoken-word parts of the piece. When she spoke the final words, “… that government of the people, by the people, for the people (el gobierno del pueblo, por el pueblo y para el pueblo) shall not perish from the earth,” the audience rose and began cheering and shouting so loudly that Copland could not hear the remainder of the music. Copland continued, “It was not long after that the dictator was deposed and fled from the country. I was later told by an American foreign service officer that the Lincoln Portrait was credited with having inspired the first public demonstration against him. That, in effect, it had started a revolution.

It should also be noted that because of his leftist views Copland was blacklisted and Lincoln Portrait withdrawn from the 1953 inaugural concert for President Eisenhower.

Happy Birthday Mr. Lincoln!

2.11.2023 – our era is rage

our era is rage
equal opportunity
rage … not have enough

Based on the article, When Did Hospitality Get So Hostile? by Ligaya Mishan (NYT – 2/10/2023).

Ms. Mishan writes:

Ours is an era of rage.

Equal-opportunity rage: Even people with power and capital (social, cultural, financial) perceive themselves as not having enough.

And while this has been exacerbated by our past few years in thrall to a virus — something tiny, invisible, insidious and still incompletely understood — it started earlier, with the society-wide turn to consumerism, the mimetic pursuit of status through acquisition, the elevation of wealth to a gospel, the patronizing and dehumanizing of the have-nots and the growing rift between rich and poor, which is now close to an abyss.

The brilliance of the system is that it pits us against each other rather than those above us; it encourages us to worship and seek to imitate our overlords, not depose them.

I have long thought that the first real sign of the end times would be when people began to ignore that engine of common courtesy known as the 4-way stop.

When drivers no longer obeyed the laws, both written and unwritten, about how to handle a 4-way stop, then the end could not be far off.

It seems that the powers that be had the same concern about the end times so they invented the traffic circle.

Here in the low country, the powers that be love the traffic circle and they bring out statistics to show how effective they are.

T Bone crashes or crashes where cars meet at a 90 degree angle dropped 90% on the intersections that went from a traditional 4 way stop to a traffic circle.

That cars no longer approached other cars at a 90 degree angle was not cited as a reason for the drop in T-Bone accidents.

As Mr. Mencken kind of said, no one ever went broke under estimating the American intellect.

(Notice the State of Georgia removing the Confederate Battle Flag from their state flag due to public clamor. Notice the State of George replacing the Confederate Battle Flag with the Confederate National Colors and no one noticing.)

So I need a new sign of the coming end times to replace the 4-way stop.

Behavior in restaurants may be my next sign of end times as hospitality gets redefined.

Ms. Mishan writes:

Hospitality, as it has been understood for thousands of years, is a gift, unconditional, outside politics, giving food, shelter and aid — whatever you have, however little it is — to a stranger who may not speak your language or know your ways, and asking nothing in return.

The transaction upends the relationship. The diner who slaps down a Platinum Amex expects something spectacular in exchange. Dance for me. Make it worth my while.

Ms. Mishan closes with:

HOSTILITY AND HOSPITALITY: how faint the line between them.

The Latin hostis once meant “guest,” then became, through some shadowy slippage of language, the word for “enemy” 

I certainly see this.

I certainly feel this.

The brilliance of the system is that it pits us against each other rather than those above us.

It encourages us to worship and seek to imitate our overlords, not depose them.

Brilliant indeed.

Ours is an era of rage.

What can be next but the end times.

1.17.2023 – these illusory

these illusory
and ridiculous promises
never understood

My feeling that writers who write about economics get to use the best multisyllable words was reinforced by the NY Times opinion piece, The Crypto Collapse and the End of the Magical Thinking That Infected Capitalism, by Mihir A. Desai, a professor at Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School.

Mr. Desai gets to use wonderful $5 words when he writes:

Pervasive consumer-facing technology allowed individuals to believe that the latest platform company or arrogant tech entrepreneur could change everything. Anger after the 2008 global financial crisis created a receptivity to radical economic solutions, and disappointment with traditional politics displaced social ambitions onto the world of commerce. The hothouse of Covid’s peaks turbocharged all these impulses as we sat bored in front of screens, fueled by seemingly free money.

For me, this opinion piece was summed up in two sentences.

The first, These illusory and ridiculous promises share a common anti-establishment sentiment fueled by a technology that most of us never understood. Who needs governments, banks, the traditional internet or homespun wisdom when we can operate above and beyond?

Not only does it explain, for me the bitcoin fixation but most of the aspects of the covid era.

What I found fascinating was that Mr. Desai linked two worlds together for me.

There is this group, right, that for the most part, boiled down to its essence DOES NOT TRUST GOVERNMENT.

Vaccines, elections, gun rights and border control.

This group does not trust the government and wants the government out of their lives.

Who are these people?

As Mr. Desai pointed out, they are ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT.

They are the 1960’s HIPPIES come to life as 2020’s conservatives.

And at their core, just like the hippies, they are against everything.

As Brando said when asked, “ Hey Johnny, what are you rebelling against?“, replied, “Whadda you got?

Who needs governments, banks, the traditional internet or homespun wisdom when we can operate above and beyond?

And really what do these people want to accomplish?

Don’t ask me.

these illusory
and ridiculous promises
never understood

Not only did Mr. Desai explain identify this New Hippie Era to me, he also explained the mystery of cyber currency for me.

Mr. Desai writes, “Speculative assets without any economic function should be worth nothing.”

I feel that way and I am not a professor at Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School.

May I paraphrase and say, something without value is should be worth nothing!

BOY HOWDY!

What to do?

Of late James Garner’s tag line from that goofy old western, Support Your Local Sherriff, keeps coming to mind.

Me?

I am just passing through on my way to Australia.

these illusory
and ridiculous promises
never understood